|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The SAM Thread
OK, I was excoriated for this suggestion in 2012, but was proven correct that it was possible and, apparently, reasonable. Can (and may) a robot interfere with a ball in flight by shooting a ball at it?
I'll give you the reality that there are only 10 seconds (generally) when more that two balls in play, so the strategic value of ack-ack is greatly reduced over Rebound Rumble. Is it worth interferrng? Tim |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Is it possible? Yes. Is it worth attempting? No.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Check with PFreivald and 1551, they might have an interesting take on this
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Best-case its a net-sum-zero strategy, so if it fits into your game plan it might be useful.
I cannot figure out how it would be genuinely useful though. Last edited by JamesCH95 : 04-02-2014 at 09:48. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Dodgeball immediately jumped to mind.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Coming out ahead in auton and locking the score. Ranking suicide in quals but could be a useful strategy if you know you've got them in auton but they can cycle faster.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Quote:
Do you really think trying to hit a ball out of the air with another ball would be better than a 2 or 3 robot defensive blockade? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Quote:
You did ask for a case when it would make sense, not a case in which I would do it. ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The SAM Thread
Touche good sir!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|