|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
2014 District Point Model Analysis
Main Reference: 2014 Projected District Point System
Below are some VERY interesting graphs and stats from the 2/6/14 PNW District Webinar (Video): ![]() ![]() ![]() ^This graph was the most interesting. I'm currently working on a further analysis including the other newer district regions: MAR, NE and our friends in Canada ![]() The Pacific NW webinar and these graphs inspired me to take my old model and apply the new point system and include average OPR: PNW 2013 Code:
Rank Team Points OPR OPR Rank 1 1983 130 49.97 4 2 2471 130 52.50 3 3 948 116 65.44 1 4 360 96 31.79 17 5 1425 92 49.91 6 6 1899 89 49.94 5 7 3663 87 46.89 7 8 2046 84 15.58 63 9 1318 76 38.93 12 10 955 74 46.76 8 11 1540 73 26.77 28 12 2907 73 46.26 9 13 1595 70 32.37 16 14 2557 68 26.03 30 15 4089 68 7.83 97 16 2928 66 32.51 15 17 2733 60 21.57 44 18 4061 60 31.35 18 19 4579 60 42.94 10 20 3789 58 22.85 41 21 2930 56 12.28 79 22 3711 56 19.78 51 23 3812 56 53.77 2 24 4125 53 15.34 67 25 4205 52 24.97 34 26 753 48 3.78 117 27 2374 47 29.40 23 28 3219 45 14.42 73 29 4488 45 25.75 31 30 2605 44 28.22 25 31 4512 44 29.02 24 32 488 43 20.15 48 33 2147 43 23.46 40 34 4127 43 36.16 13 35 2635 42 15.40 65 36 492 41 23.48 39 37 3968 41 20.28 47 38 997 40 30.99 20 39 3131 40 12.54 77 40 2811 39 19.61 52 41 2990 37 29.84 22 42 3826 37 30.41 21 43 2412 36 19.98 49 44 4086 36 18.05 54 45 2522 35 26.22 29 46 4681 34 21.65 43 47 3574 33 17.00 57 48 2922 32 23.98 36 49 4772 31 3.46 118 50 2517 30 7.52 98 51 4030 29 23.72 37 52 1258 28 12.34 78 53 3238 28 34.92 14 54 2910 27 15.88 60 55 3681 27 19.07 53 56 847 26 26.91 27 57 4057 26 15.87 61 58 4077 26 15.92 59 59 1294 24 31.25 19 60 3693 23 17.99 56 61 4662 23 3.01 121 62 956 22 23.51 38 63 1359 22 25.26 32 64 2923 22 5.01 108 65 2929 22 22.79 42 66 4060 22 -1.95 140 67 4461 22 4.07 115 68 4495 22 9.85 89 69 4513 22 16.23 58 70 4652 22 15.33 68 71 4692 22 2.60 123 72 4542 21 8.26 94 73 4682 21 6.56 101 74 2944 20 2.73 122 75 2976 19 10.63 85 76 4726 19 2.58 124 77 2411 18 5.17 107 78 2915 18 5.37 106 79 4450 18 41.36 11 80 4560 18 13.13 76 81 4654 18 14.33 74 82 4683 18 15.35 66 83 4038 17 25.04 33 84 4120 17 13.28 75 85 4469 17 19.93 50 86 4457 16 -7.65 154 87 4548 16 3.09 120 88 4559 16 11.95 80 89 4608 16 -9.09 156 90 1510 15 0.96 131 91 2926 15 5.51 104 92 3995 15 -0.86 138 93 4043 15 10.26 87 94 4082 15 -0.56 137 95 4309 15 9.31 91 96 3221 14 8.15 95 97 3860 14 -0.42 136 98 4132 13 -4.35 150 99 4173 13 -2.55 143 100 4180 13 11.43 82 101 2093 12 10.65 84 102 3220 12 9.98 88 103 3587 12 -0.26 135 104 3588 12 21.24 45 105 3787 12 0.67 133 106 3674 11 1.37 129 107 4110 11 4.27 112 108 4304 11 0.84 132 109 957 10 -3.94 148 110 1432 10 9.28 92 111 1778 10 5.77 103 112 2002 10 5.87 102 113 2555 10 3.98 116 114 3268 10 15.11 70 115 3393 10 26.93 26 116 3684 10 20.36 46 117 3712 10 5.50 105 118 3781 10 14.51 72 119 3801 10 7.44 99 120 2521 9 4.26 113 121 2542 9 15.10 71 122 2660 9 8.08 96 123 4051 9 15.52 64 124 4105 9 -2.56 144 125 4131 9 0.97 130 126 949 8 4.69 111 127 2148 8 4.08 114 128 2149 8 24.46 35 129 2192 8 4.83 109 130 2550 8 15.71 62 131 2903 8 1.40 128 132 2906 8 4.72 110 133 2927 8 18.04 55 134 3223 8 10.41 86 135 3286 8 -5.54 151 136 3586 8 11.19 83 137 3813 8 -0.99 139 138 3576 7 9.71 90 139 3786 7 15.29 69 140 1571 6 3.19 119 141 2898 6 6.57 100 142 3024 6 -2.98 146 143 3070 6 -3.95 149 144 3192 6 11.83 81 145 3636 6 -2.47 142 146 3673 6 -2.84 145 147 3876 6 2.18 126 148 2942 4 1.95 127 149 2980 4 -3.05 147 150 3049 4 -2.40 141 151 3662 4 8.74 93 152 1823 3 -6.93 153 153 3575 3 -8.42 155 154 3218 2 -0.05 134 155 3831 2 2.38 125 156 3237 0 -5.84 152 I graphed Teams and sorted by Rank, showing Points vs. OPR: ![]() *I realize there is a lot of statistical noise. I also didn’t normalize the events. With all of this in mind: 64 teams would qualify for the District Championship. 10 district Chairman winners, 54 taken from the point system ranking. Points accrued at the District Championship are worth (3x) as much. PNW would then send the following (24) teams to the World Championship: -3 Winning Alliance Members -3 Chairman’s Winners -1 Engineering Inspiration -1 Rookie All Star -16 Teams based off of the District Point Ranking. I love the fact that last year, our 156 teams made up slightly more than 6% of the 2509 world team count. This means that we would have filled 6% of the 400 Champ slots. I really hope that when we are in an entirely unified District System that Regions get a percentage of slots based upon their relative size. Along with the further analysis of regional representation, I am going to create a 2014 PNW District Point Database here. I'm super excited for the new District System to play out in the PNW. Good luck teams! Last edited by Navid Shafa : 21-02-2014 at 12:03. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Where was the raw data for the first graph obtained? Is there somewhere where it's already compiled, or was it mined by an individual? How far back does it extend?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
I would like to know myself, I just shot Kevin a message on Facebook. If I can't obtain it, I plan on mining what I need myself to expand on graph 3.
Last edited by Navid Shafa : 21-02-2014 at 09:08. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
My theory would be Zondag's spreadsheet would have most of this data.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Yes the data for the first graph is from data presented by FiM.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Quote:
Being on the District Championship winning alliance does not earn you an automatic spot at World Championship. It is highly likely that you will earn a spot with the points that you earn from being on the winning alliance, but it could be possible that the 2nd pick doesn't make the cut. This is done to give those teams from the Valleys of Doom a better chance of moving on and tries to minimize the chances of that 16th pick getting a ride on the coat tails of the #1 seed. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Its interesting, but these graphs don't really show anything that anyone couldn't automatically tell you. #1 and #2 alliances are the strongest, and overreward 15th and 16th picks compared to their OPR.
The district model does a better job of ensuring the best robots go to CMP, and consequently, Michigan representation in CMP elims is more indicative of their size in the league. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Quote:
Last edited by Steven Donow : 21-02-2014 at 12:04. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Very cool graphs! Comparing the first two graphs is definitely very cool... it really does show how much of an improvement the district system should make in sending good robots onward!
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Actually they told us in the last district meeting that winning the Championship does NOT get you an automatic bid to worlds. I don't really understand it, but if that's what they decided then that's what they decided.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
It's not automatic but the points involved typical result in it? /speculation
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
That's correct. There is no automatic bid- but if you think about it, a winning team would be (assuming no backup bots) 30 points for winning multiplied by 3 for being a district championship. That's 90 points, which should be plenty to put that team in a good position to advance regardless.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
At least for New England, the winners at DCMP will move on to CMP automatically, as mentioned at the bottom of this link... http://www.nefirst.org/2014/02/04/ne...structure-faq/
I'm not sure if this is a global FIRST decision or an NEFIRST decision... I don't think it is mentioned in either this blog post (http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...Kickoff-Taping) or the official points supplement (http://www3.usfirst.org/sites/defaul...ng_System.pdf). |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 District Point Model Analysis
Following up - this was a misunderstanding on my part. Teams who win the District Championship do not receive auto-bids to the FIRST Championship, but as you smart people already figured out, they're going to slide to the top of the invite list because of winning anyway.
Post is updated. Life is an iterative process. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|