|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Week 3 analysis
For thouse who competeted or watched week 3 regionals what did you see/learn?
For us we learned that if you could grab the ball and hold on it to it to the point where it won't come out you would fairly well. Also a simple robot that could pass and defend was super great. Also defending 2 robots at once from getting the ball was something that became a super helpful skill. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
yes, we attended a week three event WPI and did extremely well because of the defense, when not controlling a ball we would completely shut down the opposing alliance from scoring, and we established our catapult so that we can shoot while getting defended worked real great
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Pedestal delays were still occurring this week at St. Louis. We had one match where it never lit up after a cycle completed, after about 10 seconds of yelling about it we finally just grabbed it and threw it on the field anyway. Other times delays were around 5 seconds. Have that happen a few times in a match and it adds up.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
The 1 point goal is real.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
This.
Two of the best shooters at the New York Tech Valley Regional, 20 and 1126 paired up for eliminations. Until finals, the alliance scored a total of 1 high goal during teleop. #Lowgoalisbestgoal |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
It is the foul points that win/lose many of the games. Also, the refs/volunteers seem to take their sweet time lighting up the pedestals and getting the balls back in play once ejected from the field.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Make sure you know what you're talking about before you make broad statements like that.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Sorry, my bad. At the NC and Palmetto regionals there were many instances where the pedestals would take up to 20 seconds to light up after a cycle ended. Also, if a ball was ejected from a robot out of the field, the volunteers seemed very confused with how to get the ball in play/who to give the ball to so they can get it into play, in some cases the ball was passed around the field only to be given to the human player who was next to the volunteer when the ball was collected.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
It's also worth noting though that most of these errors were just during practice matches on the first day, and when such errors did determine the outcome of a qualification or elimination match, the refs did the right thing and decided that a replay was in order. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
Refs were very inconsistent with replaying matches when cycles took abnormally long to start. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
In Dallas I heard a lot of G28 but G40 is something I didn't hear. The only foul I disagree with is that another teams ball flew into the air and landed in our robot and we were pinned. We discarded the ball immediately but were given a foul that I found unfair.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|