|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
UTC Regional Scores
Posted by Wayne Wnuck at 03/05/2001 11:59 PM EST
Engineer on team #177, Bobcats, from South Windsor High School and International Fuel Cells. Here are some of the average scores at the end of the qualifying rounds (8 matches, lowest score dropped): Rank - Avg. Pts. 1 - 239 2 - 206 3 - 202 4 - 202 5 - 196 6 - 186 7 - 183 8 - 174 9 - 168 10 - 166 15 - 150 20 - 139 26 - 125 (median) 40 - 94 51 - 63 High score in qualifying rounds was 414, I think. Semi-final matches: No. 1 alliance (392, 296 pts.) vs. No. 4 alliance (58, 246 pts. No. 2 alliance (360, 40 pts.) vs. No. 3 alliance (390, 520 pts.) Finals: No. 1 alliance (240, 320 pts.) vs. No. 3 allinace (510, 510 pts.) These scores are believed (but not guaranteed) to be accurate. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UTC Regional Scores
Posted by Stephen Riley at 03/06/2001 1:33 AM EST
Engineer on team #419, RAMBOTS, from Wentworth Institute of Technology and Umass/BCHigh and Mathsoft, Solidworks, and NASA. In Reply to: UTC Regional Scores Posted by Wayne Wnuck on 03/05/2001 11:59 PM EST: nope i believe those are pretty accurate scores, at least for the finals anyway. Steve |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Check out the SoCal regional scores! | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 02:43 |
| The Winning Alliance From the UTC New England Regional | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 01:39 |
| Reminder: UTC regional site will be updated! | archiver | 2001 | 12 | 24-06-2002 01:37 |
| Predictions for UTC New England Regional | Todd Derbyshire | Regional Competitions | 78 | 09-04-2002 22:45 |
| Why are there 63 teams at the UTC regional??? | CMC | General Forum | 17 | 03-01-2002 17:06 |