|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
So, this is strictly IMHO, and feel free to shoot me down or point out misses in my reading of the rules I may have made. But, there are some pretty scary things that the rules allow, or more properly explicitly don't disallow. Here are the three that I've found.
1. Driving on top of Totes. I'm not suggesting this would be a good idea, but there's no rule I can find that prohibits a robot from using a mechanism to drive on top of a Tote. Seems like a safety concern as that would put the robot pretty close to the top of the guardrail. 2. Really tall stacks of stuff falling. While it might not be a sound game strategy, nothing prohibits the carrying of a stack of 6 totes topped by a recycling container. That's a pretty scary situation if the green garbage can at the top starts wobbling in your direction. 3. Obnoxiously large robots. Again, as with all of these points, I'm not sure why you'd want to do this, but....nothing prevents you from making a 27 foot long robot. While I can't imagine your alliance partners being happy with this, this isn't explicitly prevented and could really be a downer if the team insisted on going on the field with all 27 feet. My point in this post is to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek about the matter. I know we could file all of these under "safety" if something goes wrong. But, at the same time at least the first two examples above could be excecuted safely, but if not executed properly would become unsafe. Last edited by jee7s : 03-01-2015 at 23:20. Reason: spelling, clarificaiton |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
The twenty foot long (or wide) bot may be a legit option this year. Just sayin.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Also, some things I noticed:
1. Since you don't need bumpers, there's nothing actually stopping you from making a flying robot or helicopter thing. It also could fly infinitely high since it itself isn't 78 inches tall. 2. Both alliances can drop all of their litter on their side of the feild, giving each other 40 points, raising the QA. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
However, the robot battery is your only legal power source, per R20. Good luck getting that thing off the ground. It's not impossible, but hard to do.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
The size of the robot was purposeful. They did that fully existing someone to create massive robots, and honestly? I can't wait. I can't see why you would drive on top of a tote, that just seems silly and not all that unsafe either. And the stacks will be interesting...build rugged bots!!!
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Not to mention the noodle agreement. Did no one see that coming?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
I suppose we should also call R21 the Exploding Bacon-Pink-Cryptonite rule too. Congrats! Your team has a rule change (or clarification) for the ages!
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Can someone link the story behind this?
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Orlando Regional Elims last year. Something went wrong on Bacon and they needed to be a push bot for a match, so they added batteries for ballast (not connected electrically), ran it by an inspector and got it okayed. Then it was retroactively declared illegal and the alliance was retroactively DQ'd after they had advanced. Pretty painful on all sides. Last year's R21 equivalent was slightly fuzzy on whether ballast batteries were legal. It seemed like ballast batteries were probably illegal, but only after some heavy careful word parsing. Glad to see they've made it abundantly clear this year.
I don't see any rules that prohibit flight, actually. Though practically speaking, you're just not making a drone with an 8 lb payload out of RS550s, a lead acid battery, and all the required electronics. Last edited by Kevin Sevcik : 04-01-2015 at 00:23. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Tethered mini bots. So long as they all share 1 battery, 1 PDP, etc you can make as many connected mini bots as you want.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Why stop at minibots? You could have multiple full size bots stacked to the limit sharing a power source LoL
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odd things the rules allow, and should probably be changed
Quote:
I want to see a bipedal humanoid robot stack a tote. Or maybe a hexapod climb over the landfill and grab containers. I'm not sure which would be cooler. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|