Go to Post If you have a problem with a team, go to that team and address it with them. Don't air your slanderous opinions here for all to see. - Andy Baker [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-16-2015, 01:54 PM
A13N007's Avatar
A13N007 A13N007 is offline
Registered User
FRC #3000
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: 'Murica
Posts: 11
A13N007 has a spectacular aura aboutA13N007 has a spectacular aura about
Lifting mechanism

Hi! Our team is a bit ahead and were stuck and wondering if anyone has had there "Arm" part built yet. Our system (without letting the cat out of the bag) is were planning to pick up 3 totes at a time, or 2 totes and a recycle bin. We are assuming to use a 16:1 gear ratio, were thinking its kinda low on 1 cim motor. Anyone have any kind of expirence with a diffrent gear ratio on thier lifting mechanism? Any help would be appreciated, thanks !
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-16-2015, 01:59 PM
Amar Shah Amar Shah is offline
Registered User
FRC #1899 (Saints Robotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 84
Amar Shah has a spectacular aura aboutAmar Shah has a spectacular aura aboutAmar Shah has a spectacular aura about
Re: Lifting mechanism

If you are using a linear mechanism for lifting, the gear ratio does not tell much. What ultimately determines the speed at which totes can be lifted is the relationship between turns of the motor and distance traveled, and is affected by both any gearing you do and by the radius of a winch spool or pinion gear meshing with the rack, or the thread density of a leadscrew.

Have you considered using more than one CIM motor? There are many COTS gearboxes which support two or three motors.

Last edited by Amar Shah : 01-16-2015 at 02:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-16-2015, 02:20 PM
A13N007's Avatar
A13N007 A13N007 is offline
Registered User
FRC #3000
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: 'Murica
Posts: 11
A13N007 has a spectacular aura aboutA13N007 has a spectacular aura about
Re: Lifting mechanism

Thank you fully understand what your saying were more considered with torque than speed, do you think this will be enough torque to lift and hold?
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-16-2015, 02:23 PM
pwnageNick's Avatar
pwnageNick pwnageNick is offline
It's like yeeee ho
AKA: Nick Coussens
FRC #2451 (PWNAGE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 400
pwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond reputepwnageNick has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lifting mechanism

Quote:
Originally Posted by A13N007
Thank you fully understand what your saying were more considered with torque than speed, do you think this will be enough torque to lift and hold?
Speed and torque tend to directly relate to each other. It's hard for any outsider to judge if your ratios are okay if we don't know what kind of mechanism it is? Is this a linear lift (i.e. elevator) or is it an arm (i.e. 1-joint arm/link) or is it some kind of linkage (i.e. 4-bar, 6-bar, etc.).

I understand not wanting to give everything about your robot away, but it's tough for people to give advice about detailed design points without knowing the general concept of the mechanism.
__________________
FRC 2451: PWNAGE, Student/Team President (2009-2012)
FRC/VEX 2451: PWNAGE, Strategy/Design Mentor (2013-)
VEXU NAR: North American Robotics, Student/Chapter President (2013-)
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 02:03 PM
A13N007's Avatar
A13N007 A13N007 is offline
Registered User
FRC #3000
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: 'Murica
Posts: 11
A13N007 has a spectacular aura aboutA13N007 has a spectacular aura about
Re: Lifting mechanism

Sorry for the late reply, we have a linear lift with one motor.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 02:12 PM
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,799
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lifting mechanism

Draw a diagram, give us more detailed information, describe your mechanism in better detail. We want to help, but can't.

It's week 4 of build, I doubt many teams are going to try and copy your arm design. I bet many teams already have comparable designs. I can sort-of understand wanting to keep your design a secret, but, at bag day would you like to have a secret non-working mechanism, or a known and working mechanism?

Alternatively, use the JVN design calculator, the pull-down edition is best, to analyze your arm. You can find it with google.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 02:16 PM
Mike Marandola Mike Marandola is offline
Lead Bumper Mentor
AKA: Mike Marandola
FRC #0316 (Lunatecs)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Pedricktown, NJ
Posts: 657
Mike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lifting mechanism

Quote:
Originally Posted by A13N007 View Post
Sorry for the late reply, we have a linear lift with one motor.
What size pulley/sprocket/drum?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
Alternatively, use the JVN design calculator, the pull-down edition is best, to analyze your arm. You can find it with google.
This is a good idea. It's what we and many other teams use.
__________________

2015 - Pioneer Valley District Finalists/Upper Darby District Finalists/MAR District Championship #1 Seed and Winners with 225 and 203
2014 - Lenape Seneca District Winners/Chestnut Hill District Winners
2013 - Lenape Seneca District Winners/Chestnut Hill District Finalists
2011 - Philadelphia Regional Finalists
2009 - Finger Lakes Regional Finalists


Last edited by Mike Marandola : 01-28-2015 at 02:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 03:32 PM
StephenNutt StephenNutt is online now
Registered User
FRC #0172 (Falgor)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 36
StephenNutt is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Lifting mechanism

You generally want to run a motor at 66-75% of its free speed, which will be 25-33% of it stall torque and stall current. If you look at Motor Information you can see what speed and torque this will be for a CIM.

It is good to avoid running the motor slower than 50% of its free running speed as you can get the same amount of power out of the motor by changing your gear ratio and running the motor faster, producing less heat and using less energy.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 04:00 PM
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,539
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lifting mechanism

For a CIM-based system, we usually figure this by looking at the 40A point on the performance curve, since we can maintain that speed for a time without tripping breakers. Then, look at the torque, multiply by your gear ratio, and divide by your moment arm (the radius of your pulley or half the pitch diameter of a sprocket). This will give you the theoretical lift force. You can probably expect a 10%-20% loss from there.

In your case, assuming a one-CIM, 16:1 gearbox driving a 15-tooth #35 sprocket (I have its pitch diameter of 1.8" memorized since we're using these this year in this application), that's 100 oz-in * 16 / .9in = 111 lb; plenty of lift, and very close to what 3946 is building. If your sprocket/pulley is larger, say 4" in diameter, it would only be about 50 lb, which (after losses) might not be enough to lift a stack of 6 totes.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 08:42 PM
PaulEleven PaulEleven is offline
Registered User
FRC #5633 (Hyde Phoenix Robotix)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Bath, Maine
Posts: 26
PaulEleven is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Lifting mechanism

We got the building block 220 from andymark with first credits, so we're using a mini cim, 64:1 on a 15T#35 sprocket, gives you roughly 10in/s without load, stall torque of over 700lbs, and at maximum load during a competition somewhere between 4in/s-6in/s reliably.
If you think we're not safety nut enough it's a double sprocket....
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-28-2015, 10:18 PM
jimwick's Avatar
jimwick jimwick is offline
jim wick
FRC #0885 (the Green Team)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: tunbridge, vermont
Posts: 94
jimwick is a glorious beacon of lightjimwick is a glorious beacon of lightjimwick is a glorious beacon of lightjimwick is a glorious beacon of lightjimwick is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Lifting mechanism

We've lifted four totes and a bin using a single CIM and a 12.75 tranny. We wind directly on the shaft of the tranny. Speed is acceptable for 1-3 totes, a little slow for four. Groans a little but goes. Backdrives a little but workable.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-29-2015, 01:01 AM
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,211
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lifting mechanism

"Linear mechanism" as in a leadscrew?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi