#FRCTop10

[FRCTop10]

Hey guys, FRCTop10 here, below is a link to find the Top Plays from Week 2 Events! Enjoy!!!

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

Follow us on twitter @FRCTop10
Email us at frctop10@gmail.com

[g_sawchuk]

Originally Posted by FRCTop10

Hey guys, FRCTop10 here, below is a link to find the Top Plays from Week 2 Events! Enjoy!!!

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

http://bit.ly/1B671y3

Follow us on twitter @FRCTop10
Email us at frctop10@gmail.com

Just curious, how is this different than FRCTop25?
EDIT: I see, bit different. My bad.

[techtiger1]

This is great stuff, keep up the good work #FRCTOP10.

[FRCTop10]

Originally Posted by techtiger1

This is great stuff, keep up the good work #FRCTOP10.

Thanks! We're trying our best to keep up the energy!

[who716]

I like what your doing here good job but I think you should increase it to top 100 maybe then we would qualify!!
I woulda thought 1114 would have been first

[RonnieS]

Not sure if my eyes are bad but I believe 67 was doing stacks of 5, not 6...I could be wrong...
-Ronnie

[FRCTop10]

Originally Posted by Ronnie314

Not sure if my eyes are bad but I believe 67 was doing stacks of 5, not 6...I could be wrong...
-Ronnie

Hey you could be totally right!? We have bad eyes and wear glasses as well so we're probably in the same boat! Either way still a smooth delivery method of stacks am I right?! Thanks for the feedback!

[wesbass23]

Mukwonago, I love hearing people try to pronounce Wisconsin city names.

[RonnieS]

Originally Posted by FRCTop10

Hey you could be totally right!? We have bad eyes and wear glasses as well so we're probably in the same boat! Either way still a smooth delivery method of stacks am I right?! Thanks for the feedback!

Yes, did we expect anything less from them? Beautiful machines every year that just look so simple when you see them.
-Ronnie

[Adam Freeman]

Originally Posted by Ronnie314

Not sure if my eyes are bad but I believe 67 was doing stacks of 5, not 6...I could be wrong...
-Ronnie

Correct, we were only running stacks of 5 at Waterford. We were dealing with some other issues and we not able to get the hold down for a 6 stack operational in time to run it in matches.

We have since corrected our issues and solved the holddown problem, so we should be running stacks of 6 going forward. Hoepfully we've got some other improvements to make to help reduce our cycle time and increase our match contributions.

-Adam

[Andrew Schreiber]

Originally Posted by Adam Freeman

Correct, we were only running stacks of 5 at Waterford. We were dealing with some other issues and we not able to get the hold down for a 6 stack operational in time to run it in matches.

We have since corrected our issues and solved the holddown problem, so we should be running stacks of 6 going forward. Hoepfully we've got some other improvements to make to help reduce our cycle time and increase our match contributions.

-Adam

I blame Michael... Instead of fixing robots he was galavanting around Kansas eating BBQ.

[Adam Freeman]

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber

I blame Michael... Instead of fixing robots he was galavanting around Kansas eating BBQ.

Yeah, we're blaming Mike for a bunch of stuff.

Actually his parts (co-op mechanism) are coming off the robot...so we can focus entirely on scoring stacks.

[RonnieS]

Originally Posted by Adam Freeman

Yeah, we're blaming Mike for a bunch of stuff.

Actually his parts (co-op mechanism) are coming off the robot...so we can focus entirely on scoring stacks.

But if you take them off how are you going to score all those co-op points in playoffs?!?!?!
-Ronnie

[Adam Freeman]

Originally Posted by Ronnie314

But if you take them off how are you going to score all those co-op points in playoffs?!?!?!
-Ronnie

Interesting design fact: The can grabber was also designed with the ability to hold totes as an added bonus... so, if we really need to perform the co-op function for our alliance (ie; 2 better stackers) it is possible we could still perform a co-op stack. Although it probably wouldn't be pretty.

[Mike Schreiber]

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber

I blame Michael... Instead of fixing robots he was galavanting around Kansas eating BBQ.

It's spelled gallivanting. And BBQ is better than corn dogs. You can quote me on that.

Originally Posted by Adam Freeman

Yeah, we're blaming Mike for a bunch of stuff.

Actually his parts (co-op mechanism) are coming off the robot...so we can focus entirely on scoring stacks.

Yup, I effectively did nothing this year. At least I don't have to fix anything.

Originally Posted by Tungrus

Guess every team has a Michael!

A mentor with a full time job that involves travel who can't be at every meeting? What are you implying?

Originally Posted by Ronnie314

But if you take them off how are you going to score all those co-op points in playoffs?!?!?!
-Ronnie

The same way 1114 does.