|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Adding, removing, then adding a part
This year, Team 4961 has a mechanism designed to grab RC's from the center step. However, this mechanism is preventing us from properly getting totes from the landfill.
My question is: can we add and remove the part at will during an event? If we are inspected with the mechanism are we allowed to remove it if we feel the need? Or will we need to be re-inspected every time we add/remove it? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
If you initially inspect with all modular parts to your robot, provided all of this doesn't weigh in over 120lbs, and (maybe) prove all configurations are safe, you won't have to reinspect each time you want to change your robot.
Alternatively, yes, you can just reinspect each time. YMMV with the RI's when doing that though ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Thanks
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Easy answer: just have it inspected in each configuration. As long as the sum of the configurable parts is not >120 lbs you're fine.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Every time you add or remove components, please get inspected. At FIM events inspectors keep tab of weight changes and not very pleased when they find out your weight has changed at the end of qualifications they have no record of it. Its not about how much has changed (as long as total weight is with in limit), rather its about process.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Then one should make sure that no part/material from outside the pre-weighed stock is used. Or adding such parts does not exceed the 120 lbs limit.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
The rule is pretty clear.
Robot +sub system <120lb. Inspect once. change out as desired. Make sure the inspector is aware of the different configurations. Especially if you are adding/removing something conspicuous. Have him note on on the inspection form. For example our spare set of grippers was weighed with & inspected with the robot so we could use them without reinspection. Robot +sub system > 120lb Reinspect every time unless subsystem is an identical direct replacement. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
We have a ramp that we would potentially not use if 2 other alliance members needed to use the feed stations. The drive team is under the impression based on RI comments that the robot would have to be re-inspected if they unhooked the ramp from the robot and did not place the ramp on the field. I pointed out rule T.10, section F to our drive team. If they are really concerned about the re-inspection they will get an official ruling. I would think the worst case scenario is get the robot inspected twice, once with the ramp and once without. I can't imagine the robot needs to be inspected every time the ramp is added/removed from the robot. Or, it could just be their mis-understanding too ![]() -Eric |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
Verified this rule after my initial response. However depending on LRI, it may be little different. I have seen inspectors asking how the weight changed from previous weight check, at FIM everytime robot is weighed they make a note of it. Even if the weight has gone down. My recommendation is always talk to inspector who is incharge of weighing machine. Just to clarify, adding/changing mechanical parts does not require full robot inspection. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
I was quite surprised by the inspectors at FiM Escanaba this year. They made announcements and passed out flyers to each team saying that every time a team added or removed a tethered ramp they would need to be reinspected or 'face serious consequences'.
We didnt use a ramp so it didnt affect us, but I was still rather erked that they were making other teams follow that impromptu rule when the written rules clearly allow for subsystems to be swapped so long at the total weight is under 120lbs and they were all inspected. I do like that they are trying to monitor teams legality through the event rather than just once and done. I think they just took it one step too far at Escanaba.... |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adding, removing, then adding a part
Quote:
Best to weigh with all the parts you want (assuming you can fit it all into the 120# limit), and when you are inspected, show all possible configurations to the RI. Then, you are free to use whichever of the configurations you want. If all the variations do not fit into the 120# limit, then you need to reinspect whenever you add parts from what was not in the 120# set when you last weighed. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|