|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which changes would you like to see at IRI? | |||
| Replace some totes from the steps with RCs |
|
50 | 32.89% |
| Add RCs to the edge of each scoring platform |
|
33 | 21.71% |
| Increase tote points (ex:2-3) |
|
35 | 23.03% |
| Remove throwing litter |
|
75 | 49.34% |
| Additional co-op totes on the step give additional points (4=40, 5=50, 6=60) |
|
52 | 34.21% |
| Remove penalties for co-op totes going over the step |
|
87 | 57.24% |
| Let co-op totes be scored as grey totes |
|
96 | 63.16% |
| Add an extra match for quater-finals, keep avg score, drop lowest score |
|
71 | 46.71% |
| All of eliminations are W/L |
|
59 | 38.82% |
| Increase the starting amount of totes for HPs |
|
57 | 37.50% |
| Eliminate co-op |
|
35 | 23.03% |
| Co-op totes score additional points in scored stacks |
|
30 | 19.74% |
| Alliances can choose which totes in the landfill start upside-down |
|
44 | 28.95% |
| Center cans cannot be grabbed until the last 30 seconds |
|
31 | 20.39% |
| Teams can intentionally detach parts (no tethers are required) |
|
55 | 36.18% |
| Eliminations are based on highest score |
|
16 | 10.53% |
| Increase points of processed litter |
|
20 | 13.16% |
| Allow a 3rd party to drive a totebot, bonus points if teams can score totebot |
|
51 | 33.55% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 152. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
IRI Rule Change Vote 2.0
I want to start off with apologizing if this seems like spam. I would like to address a few things I missed in the last poll, and if you could move all discussion to this thread (as opposed to the first poll), it would be appreciated.
I'll be taking ideas that scored well in the last poll, as well as some new ones that I had left out. Please view each item as its own change, so if two options look good, but directly conflict with each other, vote for both. I'm still new to Chief Delphi, so I'm learning how things work. A poll will be posted to this thread, so hold off on comments until it has been posted. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Change Vote 2.0
Poll is now posted
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Change Vote 2.0
I'm honestly baffled by your posting these polls. I'm reasonably certain that you don't have any connection to the IRI planning committee. What are you trying to achieve that isn't handled by the original thread started by Chris Fultz?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Change Vote 2.0
While this poll certainly isn't the best way of organizing/collecting data, certainly it is easier to view results than the original thread that has become extremely large and inefficient. So he might just be trying to improve the relaying of community feedback.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Change Vote 2.0
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Change Vote 2.0
Exactly, I thought this would be an easier way for everyone to see which ideas have the most support rather than scrolling through 10+ pages of ideas.
Alan, you're right that I have no connection to the IRI planning committee whatsoever. My goal is to help them get a better understanding of which ideas are better welcomed. If I stepped out of place by making these polls, I'm sorry. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|