|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Texas districts!
Note: I did not find any threads on this. If there are any please delete or merge this.
all goes well, Texas should have districts soon! Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
When is the estimated time that districts will be introduced?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
2017 is the target we have been told.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
I guess that it's not possible for an Oklahoma team to join Texas districts, is it?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
Any idea how many teams are from Texas? Just want a number to help benchmark other states progress.
Can guarantee there will never be a Kansas district. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas districts!
136 this past year.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Texas districts!
Quote:
This is why districts based solely on state lines is, in my opinion, not a great model for FIRST. It makes much more sense to base things on where the teams are, not arbitrary state borders drawn hundreds of years ago. And we will end up with huge clusters of teams that are without any competitions to attend, and not enough teams to sustain districts or a regional on their own. But hey, they never asked me ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
Quote:
It appears Texas is forming a district themselves, so my answer for your question is no, it's not possible. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas districts!
There are some great teams just outside of Texas and I hope the committee takes into consideration how much fun we have with teams from outside the state as well as teams from outside the country, for that matter...and besides, wasn't inter-district play opened up this past year?
Last edited by 2789_B_Garcia : 21-05-2015 at 23:42. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas districts!
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas districts!
After participating this year in the Indiana District I would travel for practice during weeks 1 or 2. Having the ability to test and modify without the results counting within the district is a HUGE advantage. We did not travel this year because there was no week 1 or 2 district event with an opening that we could find.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas districts!
Furthermore, right now, only District teams are allowed to compete in other region's districts. Non-district teams cannot. Hopefully that rule will change at some point, but I don't foresee that happening.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas districts!
My understanding is that Texas will have to be some sort of hybrid district system; we don't have the population/team density that other district models have and quite a few teams that are not from Texas compete in Texas because it's their closest competition (for example, New Mexico teams come to Hub City Regional in Lubbock). We also don't want to close the border because competing with teams from out of state (and city for that matter) is a large part of the FRC experience. That being said, the committee's first meeting is next week so everything at this point is just speculation.
I am representing the Austin area on this committee and would really love constructive feedback on the district model as a whole (I love playing the devil's advocate). If there is anything that you love about your district or know of something that could be improved, please message me! Ideally, the Texas district model will incorporate everything we've learned from the models already in place. Also, if you know of any students who have opinions on the district model I'd love to include their perspective in this conversation as well. I can be reached through Chief Delphi's messaging system or through FRC Team 2881's facebook page If you are a mentor from Texas and want to contact the committee rep from your area, you should have gotten an email with everyone on the committee and their emails. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|