|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: Team 192's go to test base
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 192's go to test base
What kind of efficiency do the worm gearboxes have? I've seen that design before (powder coated red) and sold by Andymark. Worm gears either have decent efficiency (~85%) or not so good (~50%). It certainly seems very robust.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 192's go to test base
Seconded. I thought you used a 4-lead worm there, which is supposed to get above 80% efficiency, but it would be interesting if you actually recorded efficiency values.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team 192's go to test base
This has been our go to chassis. When the RoboRIO came out it was installed on this chassis along with new motor controllers. This allowed testing new controls with out any other issues. Last year in the fall besides normal driver and controls training we used for a competition in which 6 groups from our team mounted their mechanisms for a competition that was a timed event. Next was used for a tee shirt shooting robot. During build it was used as a moving chassis to test some of the prototype mechanisms that went into our 2015 robot. Then it went back to driving and software testing. This year the 2011 chassis has been just as busy. The structure that you see mounted was used Dec. 14 in a soccer ball gathering and shooting game with out 2016 prototype chassis. We had two classes given a game prompt and then 4 weeks to come with a robot. On Dec. 15 the 2011 chassis was back to driver and controls training. This is a very busy and reliable chassis.
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 192's go to test base
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team 192's go to test base
I would imagine that your bot does a great job of resisting being pushed.
Dave |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|