Go to Post So many questions are answered when people actually read the rules. - Steve W [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 13:39
SPORK_Guy's Avatar
SPORK_Guy SPORK_Guy is offline
Team SPORK Captain
AKA: Jacob Ferrier
FRC #3196 (Team SPORK)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Moorseville, North Carolina
Posts: 3
SPORK_Guy is an unknown quantity at this point
Post Flying?

So, we are searching for a rule in the manual that specifically forbids creating a robot that has the ability to fly....my better judgement says that this is a bad idea, but I cannot find a rule against it. If you have found a rule please let me know, for it could change our entire design
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 13:41
ATannahill ATannahill is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alex Tannahill
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 3,228
ATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flying?

The closest I have seen is G45.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 13:41
MikLast's Avatar
MikLast MikLast is offline
CAO/Drive Coach
AKA: Mikal Dieatrick
FRC #4513 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Medical Lake, WA
Posts: 575
MikLast is a name known to allMikLast is a name known to allMikLast is a name known to allMikLast is a name known to allMikLast is a name known to allMikLast is a name known to all
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPORK_Guy View Post
So, we are searching for a rule in the manual that specifically forbids creating a robot that has the ability to fly....my better judgement says that this is a bad idea, but I cannot find a rule against it. If you have found a rule please let me know, for it could change our entire design
Rule G17 says the robot cant be higher than 4ft 6in, may be it hard to keep within that.
__________________

Check out the FRC Discord!

2014: programmer, scout
2015: programmer, admin, drive team
Innovation in control award, WVHS district event
Innovation in control award, CWU district event
finalist, PNW district championship
2016: CAO, Drive team.
Excellence In Engineering awad, WVHS District event
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 13:44
ATannahill ATannahill is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alex Tannahill
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 3,228
ATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikLast View Post
Rule G17 says the robot cant be higher than 4ft 6in, may be it hard to keep within that.
Read the blue box of G17.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 19:58
bjtheone bjtheone is offline
Design and Fab guy
AKA: Brad Warkentin
FRC #2706 (Merge Conflict)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
bjtheone is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rtfgnow View Post
Read the blue box of G17.
G17 states that measurements are made with robot resting on the floor. Does not disallow flying or leaping.

G44 states that you cannot use the SHIELDS to cross a DEFENSE.

Leaping or flying over the DEFENSE in the space between the SHIELDS, does not violate either of these rules.I would love to see it done and suspect that flying is an almost impossible engineering challenge, but leaping...

R22 is similar to previous years and we have had all sorts of climbing and scaling operations that take the bumpers away form the floor. I would think that R22 is enforced like G17, with measurements made in a static configuration resting on the floor.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 20:06
FRC Warrior FRC Warrior is offline
Registered User
FRC #4169
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sudbury, MA
Posts: 14
FRC Warrior is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Flying?

Maybe G1?
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 13:44
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,211
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPORK_Guy View Post
So, we are searching for a rule in the manual that specifically forbids creating a robot that has the ability to fly....my better judgement says that this is a bad idea, but I cannot find a rule against it. If you have found a rule please let me know, for it could change our entire design
One could interpret G17 as not allowing it, but then it does allow for angling and the like...
interesting observation. Given the nature of the game and the new availibility of the 775pro, I could see an ultralight robot being made to fly. It would probably draw too much current though, especially given the weight of the battery and control system.

EDIT: just ran some quick numbers. You would need many, many 775pros to do anything. Each motor produces perhaps 1.4-3lbs of thrust, 1.6lbs of which goes to the weight of the motor itself (which weighs 0.8lbs, leaving between -0.2 and 1.4lbs thrust for the other parts of the robot. Chassis + battery + control system will run at least 30lbs, so you will need at minimum 21 775pros, not including any manipulators you might want to attach.
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>


Last edited by asid61 : 09-01-2016 at 13:57.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 16:34
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,721
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flying?

You'd need to fly low if you want to score points for CROSSING the DEFENSES.
__________________
(since 2004)
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 16:35
orangemoore orangemoore is offline
Registered User
AKA: Roger Moore
FRC #3135 (Robotic Colonels)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,307
orangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond reputeorangemoore has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flying?

Good luck making a robot fly with the 13 lb battery we use.
__________________
Stronghold


Student 2013-2016
3135 -- Robotic Colonels
3507 -- Robotheosis (FTC)
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 16:42
ice.berg's Avatar
ice.berg ice.berg is offline
Strategy Mentor &amp; Drive Team Coach
AKA: Alex Bergal
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Duluth MN
Posts: 149
ice.berg has a spectacular aura aboutice.berg has a spectacular aura about
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangemoore View Post
Good luck making a robot fly with the 13 lb battery we use.
plus bumpers and control system!
__________________
TEAM 2512 DULUTH EAST DAREDEVILS
'12-'15: Strategy and Build Mentor
'15 Hopper Division Champions and Einstein Finalists thanks 987, 2826, 4265
'15 Minnesota State Champions thanks 3130 and 4215
'15 Northern Lights Chairmans Winner and Regional Finalists & Central Illinois Regional Finalists
'10-'11:Build Captain
'13 Midwest Champion '12 North Star Champion '11 Lake Superior Champion

Website Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 17:08
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 175
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Flying?

G44 ... a ROBOT “leapfrogging” or “spider climbing” across a DEFENSE by applying force to the SHIELDS and lifting itself over the DEFENSE is a
violation of this rule

Leapfrogging is pretty much temporarily flying. It's mentioned in the rules, and pretty much says if you do it, do it without putting pressure on the defense shields. Just a thought.
__________________
Andy Bare
Team 1261
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 17:12
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 175
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Flying?

Also,
G17 ROBOT height, as measured when it’s resting normally on a flat floor, may not exceed 4 ft. 6 in. This is saying that one edge/corner of the robot can be more than 4'6" off the ground, as long as the height of the robot doesn't exceed 4'6". This is also shown in the rule diagram.
__________________
Andy Bare
Team 1261
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 18:43
Xanawatt Xanawatt is offline
Registered User
FRC #1024
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 18
Xanawatt is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyBare View Post
Also,
G17 ROBOT height, as measured when it’s resting normally on a flat floor, may not exceed 4 ft. 6 in. This is saying that one edge/corner of the robot can be more than 4'6" off the ground, as long as the height of the robot doesn't exceed 4'6". This is also shown in the rule diagram.
He's got a point. The rules do allow for that this year!
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 18:50
BotDesigner's Avatar
BotDesigner BotDesigner is online now
Design/CAD/Strategy/TeamManagement
AKA: David Gedney
FRC #4418 (Team Impulse)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 96
BotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud of
Re: Flying?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanawatt View Post
He's got a point. The rules do allow for that this year!
Yeah, lets just let 148 work that one out, it would be a nice successor to Tumbleweed.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 19:05
amesmich's Avatar
amesmich amesmich is online now
Registered User
FRC #4638 (Jagbots)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 99
amesmich is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Flying?

So long as the top of your bumpers are not more than 12" from the floor..... Rules out the advantage of flying.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:26.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi