|
|
|
 A wise man told me a few nights ago, that it is important to own up to all your mistakes, so that others can see you doing that and wont deny and try to hide their own. - Josh Hambright [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Mostly, this thread is so we can look back in eight weeks and realize how terribly wrong we were. Qualifying round is probably the most useful, but elimination scores are interesting to try and peg as well.
If you can post a reasoning that's awesome, but we'll take just a number as well. Click here for last year's predictions (2015) 2015 stats from TBA Previous Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 |
|
#2
09-01-2016, 15:57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
are we assuming the Palmetto Regional is in week 1 and not .5?
|
|
#3
09-01-2016, 16:00
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Quals: 20
Elims: 75 |
|
#4
09-01-2016, 16:05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Quals: 35
Elim: 80 Just keeping in mind that a good amount of points will be earned solely by driving. |
|
#6
09-01-2016, 18:56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Quals: 35
Elims: 75 |
|
#7
09-01-2016, 19:14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Quals: 24
Eliminations: 65 Edit: I think elim scores will be lower than what others think mostly because of the popularity certain tasks will have based on difficulty and because defense may be even more effective than Aerial Assault. Last edited by Rangel(kf7fdb) : 09-01-2016 at 19:17. |
|
#8
09-01-2016, 19:22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Robot in 3 days team Indiana from Andymark (I think) has been prototyping and testing all day, and they said that a higher end qual score will be about 165 (from a high level/regional winning alliance). The breakdown is 40 in auto (from 3 robots crossing and one shooting in the high goal), and the rest scored by cycling in teleop. They said with modified elims scoring they estimate an average 45 point bonus per match. I think this is pretty high, but I have not been prototyping very heavily so im not sure. This is also probably more accurate for later in the season, but they all seemed to agree that this was near the approximate score.
|
|
#9
09-01-2016, 19:47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
I guess another question is how many RPs would you expect a #1 seed to earn throughout a competition?
|
|
#10
10-01-2016, 02:21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
assuming 10 matches I could see week 1 #1 seeds scoring 36 RP
|
|
#11
10-01-2016, 08:27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Average quals week 1: 20 points
Average elims week 1: 50 points |
|
#12
10-01-2016, 10:30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Average qualifications: 20-30 points
Average eliminations: 40-50 points Winning alliance: up to 75 points |
|
#13
10-01-2016, 11:07
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Qual: 30
Elim: 75 Winning alliance: 150 Top ranked RP: 30 (for 10 matches) |
|
#14
09-01-2016, 19:21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: YOU Predict the Average Match Score of 2016's Week 1 Regionals/Districts
Quals: 50
Elims: 100 Winning alliance 150 Even newer teams should be able to score 20 points with out much difficulty. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
