|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan (Source: J. Zondag)
Last edited by Joe Johnson : 29-02-2016 at 13:27. Reason: forgot to include source |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
This is fantastic.
At first, I disliked the District Model because my team had made a habit of attending a second regional far from home. It was a huge team builder and it was a lot of fun to leave an impact on teams far away. That was (temporarily) taken away from us with Districts, but it's really easy to see the benefit that it has on the majority of teams. FRC is going to be hard to sustain moving forward simply due to the cost required to compete. Districts is the first step in the right direction to making it easier for more teams to sustain themselves. The only question I have is what's the next step? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Dr Joe,
So right. But don't forget that the Gov. Synder has been particularly supportive by setting aside $2 million in state grand funds, with legislative approval of course, to encourage the growth in the Great State of Michigan. This is in addition to the hard work of the FRC volunteer staff and members supporting this initiative in our state. Kind regards, |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Quote:
FiM runs districts with the minimalist philosophy. They don't have much more than a field, a projector to show the scores, a PA system, and spartan pit set ups. Typical districts compete with afterglow competitions with respect to cost. That really helps FIRST in Mighigan keep the costs down for their teams. Dr. Joe J. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
how much does the average event cost?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
I don't know specifics about FiM's costs, but if you take a look at the Regional & District Planning guides FIRST posts (http://www.firstinspires.org/resourc...lanning-guides) they have the average regional costing about $150,000 and the average district costing about $25,000.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Less than $41,000, probably
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
As someone who has been on the planning committee for the Midland District (formerly known as the Great Lakes Bay District) since we started it two years ago, I can tell you the cost to run our event the first year was approximately $24,000 due to a lot of one-time purchases (floor tarps being probably the biggest cost) we had to make. Going forward we expect our yearly cost to be in the range of $15,000 - $17,000 per event.
As for cost to the teams, in Michigan, teams still pay the $5000 registration fee, but instead of 1 event, they get 2 as part of that fee. If they choose to go to a 3rd event, the cost is $500. It is also worth noting that, for the most part, the district events do not actually get any of the registration money, and have to do their own fundraising to cover the bulk of the costs associated with running an event. The cost for teams to attend states is either $4000 or $5000 (can't remember) but any team affiliated with a public school can get that fee paid for by grant money set aside for teams by the State of Michigan. There is also similar grant money available for public school teams that qualify for the world championship. Last edited by cbale2000 : 28-02-2016 at 18:44. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Quote:
We've also gotten additional funding from Nexteer Automotive (which also sponsors a number of area teams directly), Dow Corning, Hemlock Semiconductor, and a handful of other sponsors. Our specific relationship with our sponsors varies; some companies allocate funds that are specifically for the district and separate from funds they allocate for teams. Some sponsors prefer to sponsor just the event itself, for various reasons. And finally some sponsors simply donate money to FIRST of the Great Lakes Bay Region and allow us to allocate it wherever it's needed (for the event, teams, or otherwise). |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Joe,
Thanks for sharing my graph to all. The key to the growth of FIRST hinges on 2 things. 1. Reducing participation costs 2. Increasing Return on Investment. When we recreated the District System 8 years ago, these were our objectives and these have never changed. The growth that that you see is a direct product of accomplishing these two goals. We are not done, we are just getting started. We work to reduce event and operating costs wherever possible. We use the money we save to help fund initiation costs for new teams and sustainability grants for existing teams. We have worked with our state government to secure over $7Million in grants. Many teams in our state play their entire season without ever paying any registration fees. We have proven beyond any doubt that reducing costs will dramatically increase growth in FRC. However, our cost reductions are artificial. We are offsetting the high cost of FIRST's enrollment fees with government money. In the grand scheme of things this is not sustainable. If administrations change, if the economy shifts, these grants may go away. So the real question is: If FIRST really wants growth, as Dean repeatedly says they do, and they have real proof of what cost reduction can do to fuel growth, then why do they not ACTUALLY reduce program enrollment costs? After 25years, and 100X growth in scale, there is still no price break from HQ. We at FiM operate on a thin operating budget. Our total operating costs are less than $1000/team/year. FIRSTs costs are about 10 times this much, despite the fact that a significant portion of the league are now in Districts and these events are not financed by FIRST anymore. If we ever want Robotics to be a sport in its own right, program enrollment costs must come down. Other leagues understand this. FIRST still apparently does not. "It is not the idea......It's the execution." |
|
#13
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Jim,
I was an idiot not to include that I got this chart from you. Sorry about that. Glad you are not upset that I shared it. There was another thread that talked about MO going to districts and I wanted to get the chart online someplace that I could link to it from within a message, so why not upload it to CD? I didn't think that this would then start its own thread. But it did and that turned out to be good too. Thanks for adding your perspective on this. I know that a lot of people think that MI is an anomaly because of the Auto Industry. And, yes, that helps but honestly, most of the growth is coming from places that have more in common with the more rural areas of NY, WI or WA than they do with Metro Detroit. There is nothing I know of in the MI experience that could not be duplicated in dozens of other states. Joe J. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
You would have to duplicate at least one Gail Alpert, and I don't know if that is possible just yet. She has more drive and passion for spreading FIRST than anyone I know. Though, I'm sure you could find someone that is near her level if you look good and hard.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Growth of FIRST in Michigan
Quote:
When I hear about the all the great work Gail and FiM are doing, I feel like we're living in the dark ages over here in CA (and that's not just because our game is medieval themed this year!) Great work Gail, Jim and the whole FiM crew. I wish certain individuals in our community would celebrate FiM's excellence, rather than diminish it or write it off! -Mike |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|