|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
The million dollar question for me is regarding the CDF...
It sounds to me from reading the CDF comments in the Palmetto thread, that the CDF's were repaired around match 10-20 or so by adding a piece of steel to the under-side of each Lexan board/teeter-totter. Is that correct? Did it resolve the CDF-demolition problems at Palmetto? I don't really see that particular fix addressed in Team Update 14... should we expect more broken CDF's in Week 1? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
Quote:
The CDFs are all being modified for week 1, though I don't recall the specifics on the change. I'll let you know in a few hours when we start making the change for the Lake Superior and Northern Lights regionals. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
Quote:
A steel plate was used at Palmetto but does not appear to be the permanent solution. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
I saw that change... I don't know anything about the exact failures seen on the CDF's at Palmetto, but I have a hard time imagining that using a BHCS in a counterbore vs a flat head screw in a countersink is significant enough to prevent CDF's from breaking consistently (as the unmodified ones did at Palmetto).
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
Can a mod please move posts 37, 41, 43, and 45 to a new thread on CDF revision? This topic deserves its own, separate discussion.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
Done!
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 14 (2016)
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Whatever the fix(es) were, based on the follow-up webinar for scorekeepers last night, the CDF has a permanent fix and FTAs know what they are. Beyond that I don't know as I haven't asked any FTAs.
That being said, if it's safe to post, if an FTA would be willing to post details, it would be very interesting. If not, well, those at week one, it's time to play "spot the difference". |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
This is second-hand but apparently, the countersunk screws were being overtightened when the CDFs were originally assembled.
This started stress cracks in the polycarb that were then aggravated by robots smashing into them. The damage to the CDF occurred along the stress cracks. The counter bore replacement of the countersink seems to have eliminated the stress cracks. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 02-03-2016 at 12:00. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Quote:
Reminds me of the time (ca 1995) that I pulled on the shoulder of I-10 for a tiny little shimmy that started suddenly. By the time I came to a stop, three of the five lugs on my right front tire had sheared clean off. I was probably a few seconds from using a pine tree as a brake. I don't know what tool they used to tighten the lugs at the shop, but it obviously wasn't the right one. I never used that shop again. Edit (especially as off-topic): I believe they were; curious as to the connection between these two. The dealer where I had the jeep towed told me they had been over-tightened. I ran the same vehicle and wheels for another 10 years without the problem recurring. Last edited by GeeTwo : 02-03-2016 at 15:38. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Quote:
When I first read your post, what came to mind was, "Wonder if this is on a four-wheel drive vehicle"? When run in four-wheel drive on an interstate, the differential turning of the front wheels can "wind up" the system. The bouncing of rough terrain keeps this from being a problem, as occurs on smooth roads. I've seen ALL the lugs on both front wheels snap at the same time because of this. Don't suppose you had it in four-wheel drive by accident, did you? Just sayin'! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CDF Discussion, post Team Update 14
Quote:
You know that on civilian vehicles you're not supposed to use impact guns on the lug nuts either? At least if you're not using a torque stick (and even then, it's technically good practice to use a torque wrench afterwards). Otherwise one risks warped brake rotors/drums an/or broken/bent/stripped lug nuts/studs/bolts. Not to be a so called torque nazi, but impact guns can really mess a lot of things up when used to torque things down. They're better suited for removing fasteners (especially rusty stuck ones). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|