First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?

[Bluman56]

Originally Posted by Bluman56

The #1 seed at every event will be a low bar bot.

I made this bold prediction not expecting to be 100% accurate, but with so many events going on this weekend, I am starting to get curious. So far, GTCR and Waterford Event (FIM District) have a low bar capable robot as the first seed alliance captain. Can we keep track of this statistic if anyone else is interested?

I apologize in advance for not being able to give out gift cards for the fastest contributors... Maybe one day

[MARS_James]

We were low bar capable at Palmetto, however never once did we cross it, or actually become a height capable to do so. So technically one could argue that we were not a low bar robot.

[jojoguy10]

1983 (Skunkworks) is low bar capable and #1 seed here at Auburn Mountainview.

[Kingland093]

Number 1 seed at Northern Lights, team 2987 is Low-bar capable
At Lake superior, I think 4009 is able to but I could be wrong

[MikLast]

5920 (1st seed at PNW West Valley) was low bar capable.

[tuxzee]

Originally Posted by Kingland093

At Lake superior, I think 4009 is able to but I could be wrong

At Lake Superior, both 4009 and 359 (#1 captain and #1 pick) could go under the low bar; however, neither of us actually did in any of the elim matches. We left that up to the 3rd alliance member, 6175.

[GCarnes]

Team 5150 was 1st seed alliance captain at FIM Kettering #1 as a low bar robot. We were able to breach the defenses every qualification match which is what kept us on top. We had a robot specifically designed and focused around breaching the defenses.

[P.J.]

3604, 1st seed at the Southfield District, was low bar capable.

After looking through the rest of this thread it looks like the only question remaining is whether team 56 (1st seed at Mt. Olive) was low bar capable.

[jwfoss]

FRC558 is low bar capable and was #1 seed at NE Waterbury District

[MARS_James]

Originally Posted by P.J.

After looking through the rest of this thread it looks like the only question remaining is whether team 56 (1st seed at Mt. Olive) was low bar capable.

Yes, yes they were.

[Bluman56]

375 at NYC Regional was low bar capable.
1678 at Central Valley was low bar capable.
2056 at GTRE was low bar capable.

I think 3158 at Mexico City was not low bar capable...

[Jeremy Germita]

1197 at Los Angeles was not low bar capable.

[Joe Ross]

1197 was first seed alliance captain at Los Angeles, and was not low bar capable. However, they were Sally Port capable.

[Chris Hapstack]

B.o.B. was the #1 seed at FIM Lakeview, and we're quite low bar-capable!

[LlNUX]

Originally Posted by Bluman56

I think 3158 at Mexico City was not low bar capable...

Thats correct 3158 was not low bar capable but their shooter was really accurate and did cycles pretty fast.