|
|
|
 "The rio has a boulder sized hole though it? *shrug* Just duct tape it. That doesn't let the code out, right?" - Bkeeneykid [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| "The rio has a boulder sized hole though it? *shrug* Just duct tape it. That doesn't let the code out, right?" - Bkeeneykid [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Revising Calls Based on Video Evidence
Hi all,
I am the vice captain of scouting for team 395 in New York. As a freshman, I have a question about reviewing calls. In our 2nd quarters match as 8th alliance, with 1 win under our belts, we "lost" the match. This happened because our first crossing of the Cheval de Frise was not recorded so we didn't get breach points, which would of gotten us up above the other alliance. After the match, given that it was a pretty simple call to make with the video they took of it, we went to talk to a ref about getting the call fixed. They refused unconditionally. I get that this is a policy for the NYC regional. What I want to know is: 1) What is the general consensus on video review? 2) And, what does CD think about it? Thanks! Last edited by It'sAScoot : 13-03-2016 at 17:01. Reason: Thought HTML worked here. Fixed |
|
#2
13-03-2016, 17:02
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Revising Calls Based on Video Evidence
|
|
#3
13-03-2016, 17:02
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Revising Calls Based on Video Evidence
Already a thread on your match and this topic
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...hreadid=145650 |
|
#4
13-03-2016, 20:47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Revising Calls Based on Video Evidence
Thanks for the link, thats one of my mentors
 |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
