|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
We've heard lots of opinions about how there are things wrong with this years game.....
What do you think has been the single BEST thing about this years game? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Autonomous mode!
I just hope they have more documentation next year to help rookie teams out with it, and they better leave it at no more than 15 seconds! Driver control should always be the main contributor to the match ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
More Interaction between robots! Auto mode, lack of non-contact rules, those lovely, breakable, blue tubs! (so innocent so so soft.)
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really liked the ramp. There is a lot of potential for tipping robots, and it taught all the teams with top heavy robots a lesson. I like the concept of robots fighting for king of the hill, and that robots have angled sides as a strategy for keeping king of the hill.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Auto mode: Watching bots crash and hit things.
Also watching our bot in 2WD push other robots up and over the ramp in automode... |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I like how things are not what they seem. Stackers, with the exception of a few (i.e. 365 and 624), are not prominant. Also KOTH are not as good of a strategy as we all thought. Also, I like this years appeal to first time spectators.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The best part is that we are one of the few teams who successfully built a robot that accomplishes the purpose of the game: stacking!
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
i like the AI mode. We stacked in one match, didnt help us very much though
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
the increase of power of the drill motors....meaning this years robot has about the same as last years robot, Fluffy, despite the different treads and gear ratios.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
it was awesome giving the software team a challenge in programming a good auto mode. Also, this year's game (for the most part) was a good one for rookie/underdeveloped teams because the design of the robot this year is only a small part of the game; strategy and driver skill is a larger determining factor making the game challenging for everyone, but also giving the rookies a fair chance w/ their first-year robot.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
the auto mode and the scoring system are awsome. I like auto mode because it sets up the game and gives the programmers a full time job, and the scoring systems makes you not want to shut down your opponent.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Auto mode
hands down Now its like a real robot, not just a big RC car. Hopefully Autonomous mode is here for good. Already wondering how they coul d do it next year. Been a good run Luck to all at Nat's |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, Auto mode is now something that runs in all of the programmers blood systems now, I think
![]() The concept of the game was really good, but there were several flaws: 1- Line-tracking - It was just too slow. I doubt there is much FIRST could've done to fix this. 2- Stacking - As it turns out, this was rarely used, yet it was one of the main factors of the game. I think the main factor should be a little more easily manipulative, like the ball/goals in the past, but it was a great idea! 3 - The bar - This was a feature that turned out to not be used often as well. There just wasn't any point to go over to your opponents side from yours, unless they just built a stack, which (as stated above) usually never happened. However, yes, the ramp was good, but it did limit the amount of open space on the field alot, and presented a few problems with center of balance, etc. It was a great game, but because of many rules/restrictions, it highly limited the true capabilities of some teams. I did enjoy the spectator-friendlyness of the game. It was great, there is definitely alot more public attention this year than ever before. I also DID like that First has begun to consider options OTHER than balls and goals, and since this is their first year experimenting without them (Or, First year for quite some time... since I've heard they've used other things in the past) I guess you can't blame them if everything doesn't quite go as expected. Overall, the experience this year was great, and we had a fun time. I look forward to giving and hearing other peoples input about the game as well! |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought the Kit was the best part of this year. Still needs some minor refinements but the Kit was WAY AWESOME! Easy for rookies to build a capable platform yet adaptable enough for veterans to buils an outstanding piece of machinery (not to say rookies couldn't do that too)
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Auto mode and the ramp combination, a very good combination.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| What changes to this year's game...? | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 20-04-2003 15:35 |
| Annual Thread: Whats this years game going to be? | team222badbrad | General Forum | 129 | 28-12-2002 14:38 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |
| i didnt like this years game....please read | archiver | 2001 | 19 | 24-06-2002 03:23 |