|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Van Door Motor Drawings
Does anyone have CAD dimensional drawings of the Van Door Motor? I've searched on the internet and Bosch's website with no luck
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
http://www.firstcadlibrary.com click on motors
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
Quote:
Thanks anyway. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
I've used the first cad library model in our solid models of the robot for the past couple of years. When we compare the design to the real thing, they match up pretty well.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
Thanks for the tips everyone!
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
Quote:
BTW the Inventor Van Door model in the FIRST CAD Library does NOT match the motor we were given this year perfectly. The bolt holes and output shaft are correct but many of the other exterior details are not. In many cases, what is there is "good enough". But if you are planning for a tight fit (like I am) you should be aware there is a difference. A manual check with the real motor is in order. It looks like the FIRST CAD Library drawing (01/24/04 version) is recycled from a previous year's motor. That's fine most of the time and 90% of people probably won't notice the difference. Personally, I'm using the FIRST CAD 2003 model and making allowances for known differences. The biggest one for me is the flange around where the motor meets the gearbox that is not in the model. None of the other differences are likely to cause an interference issue for me so I can ignore them. I am VERY apreciative of having ANY sort of model ready made, at least as a starting point. Especially on something as complex to draw as the Van Door motor. But we got burned big time last year when I didn't notice an interference in the CAD model of our robot.(I didn't even spot it until this year!, and here I spent all year thinking there was an inaccuracy in the model. My apologies Ed!). So I'm a little paranoid about checking the conformance between the CAD model and real life. FIRST CAD Library is a valuable resource and would be greatly missed if it wasn't there. But nothing made by man is ever perfect and this is one of those minor imperfections. ChrisH |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
Quote:
My list of things to do is getting long ........ I better stop sleeping at night. ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
Quote:
At this point I would concentrate on what your team/family needs from you. That model is close enough as long as people are aware that it is not up to your usual standards. Even that isn't your fault, it is accurate, just for a different year. We'll survive, just make sure you do too. ChrisH |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Van Door Motor Drawings
This may be a bit off topic, so if it's too far off for this thread, then don't bother answering me.
We too are using the Van Door motor this year, to power an arm. I'm using the actual motor for reference since I can't run our CAD packet yet. But I would like some suggestions as to how I can connect the output shaft of the motor onto something, aluminum extrusion, for example. PM me if you can help, I don't want to turn this thread around. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Van Door Worm Gear | Jim Giacchi | Motors | 4 | 16-12-2003 09:35 |
| Attn Wildstang: Found your van | Wetzel | Chit-Chat | 4 | 21-04-2003 21:41 |
| van door torque curve | DLyons | Motors | 1 | 13-01-2003 21:54 |
| We can't compete, need van door motor | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:59 |
| van door question | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:27 |