|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
sleepers for nats
OK here is my list of sleepers for nats.
222 103 25 56 i know they won but i feel people are over looking them there a solid bot 121 Last edited by nuggetsyl : 06-04-2004 at 22:22. Reason: spelling |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers fro nats
Quote:
Please define what you mean by sleepers |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
Quote:
Last edited by nuggetsyl : 06-04-2004 at 22:23. Reason: spelling |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: sleepers fro nats
i like the idea of sleepers for nats.. there are always some at regionals, but they definitely have the chance to shine with no one or two "super alliances" breaking out and dominating as so often happens.
i would bust out and choose some teams but i really havent been able to watch any regionals in detail. too much stuff in my mind to keep track of. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers fro nats
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
there's lots of good bots out there that just needed a regional (or two) to practice/troubleshoot. to name a few...
494 <-awesome team, awesome drivetrain, awesome robot 343 34 1024 1002 1057 281 <-solid robot, gave me a scare at peachtree 25 188 <-mean looking gearbox, haven't seen the robot, but nice gearbox 710 233 312 234 [edit] 461 108 more to come, pro'lly... [/edit] Last edited by RogerR : 07-04-2004 at 00:10. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
461.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
Quote:
I'll have to agree there. We paired up with them at the MWR finals...and I don't think I've seen many robots that are better ball collectors or cappers than them. --they were also my 1'st Fantasy First pick....so they must be good ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
1319
1403 11 (at least until they won a regional) 1218 Xavier You notice how I restrained myself from mentioning my own team. WILLPOWER!!!!!! |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
Quote:
My sleeper picks: 710 312 108 (so I'm a little biased) 461 21 ...that's all I can think of right now. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
Quote:
Thank you very kindly. 108 promises not to disappoint our followers . |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sleepers for nats
there was a similar thread dealing with underrated teams. And yes, I too think 1391 can do some damage at nats.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I see the 2003 National Finalist alliance is in your sleeper pick (343, 25, 494). I haven't seen our friends from 25 yet this season, but would agree that 343 is strong again. You are very kind with your comments. Thanks. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it fair to let Chairman's Award Winners go to Nats every year? | Jessica_166 | Chairman's Award | 60 | 04-05-2003 16:40 |
| Timing of nats for next year | Ian W. | Championship Event | 13 | 03-03-2003 18:28 |
| Nats and Florida | Harrison | Rumor Mill | 3 | 15-10-2002 18:52 |
| Just wondering about a button from nats... | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 04:07 |
| Would Teams be willing to hold Nats in a different place if anyone could Go? | mnkysp6353 | General Forum | 22 | 14-12-2001 10:29 |