|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
8 Drive Motor Robot
My teammate started a poll on how many motors a robot is using to drive. One team responded to the "8 or More" category. Just wondering about what that robot can do if it's using that amount of motors for driving. If anyone from that team sees this, just let me know. I'm really curious here.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
do all those motors really help? My team can not stall our motors, we have 2 and have tried with all our might to stall them- they just dont stop (wheels spin). I guess being so close to the weight limit has givin me a new view on motors
![]() Greg |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
In the case you describe, your wheels start slipping when you try stalling the motors. This happen because your robot don't have enough traction. In order to take advantage of more motors in the drive train, your robot got to have enough traction to take advantage of the extra motor power. That is why robots like 45 technokat's, or 308's, or 60's all lift goals up for more traction. By putting more weight on the powered wheels, they won't be slipping as easily, and that's when the extra motor power come into play. That's one thing I see in robots this year... It seems like teams underestimate how important lifting goals are. You can only get so much traction from 130 lbs even with the best material on wheels/tread. That is why teams made a big deal out of FIRST's change of rules when they allow 15 degree or more wedge shape to lift goals up. Also, with more motors in the drive train, you can gear the drive train to go faster without tripping the circuit breakers as easily. As a result, the robot can go much faster with faster free speed. With more motors sharing the load, you are drawing currents on more circuit breakers. Besides, the main 60 amp circuit breaker can handle a lot more amps than 60 during the 2 minute. So, over all, more motors do help the drive train in speed and pushing force. It take a little work to get them working together, but not too hard from what I heard from the engineers. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
This year I realized that the weight is a really important thing if you want traction.
In my grandpa's farm there was a truck that couldn't move because the tires were sliping on the wet sand. We put a lot of stones and sand bags on it and then we managed to drive it away. ![]() I think it's important to be pretty close to the weight limit to have more traction, and I think its a good thing that since 2001 we don't have the "FeatherWeight in the Finals" Award. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It seems like an 8-motor drivetrain would pull an awful lot of current for little advantage over a 4 or 6 motor drivetrain. With 8 motors on drive I would think that you would pop the 60A breaker if you were running any other motors to pick up balls, grab goals, etc.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, one thing to keep in mind about polls is that you are not required to be truthful. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
How are the 8 motors used? Are 4 used for normal driving, and 4 used for sideways motion, or perhaps 4 are used for steering?
Our robot uses 4. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
what else can a robot do then?
some one could have also just polled 8 or more |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ours is the 8+ motor drivetrain! (actually it uses 10)
Yes, we made a drivetrain that used 10 motors and 4 pneumatics. the system had 4 independant wheels, each of which had a motor for "crab" style steering (2 window motors and two globe motors) the two rear wheels were powered with the atwood motors, and the two front each used a drill motor and a fisher price motor together (with some code limiting the power output of the fisher price motor so the speeds would match). each "wheel" was actually a short tank tread, and the pneumatic was used to retract the tread so only one point of it was touching the ground during "crab mode" steering. right now the system is all taken apart for some reworking with new treads, but when it's back up i'll take some pics for those who haven't seen it.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ours is the 8+ motor drivetrain! (actually it uses 10)
Quote:
Robot problems in our first three matches kept us from placing well, but after a quick redesign, and some replacement parts, we were solid for the rest of our matches. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1 stick drive to 2 stick drive | wayne 05 | Programming | 18 | 01-04-2004 16:41 |
| 2-wheel versus 4-wheel drive | Ben Mitchell | Technical Discussion | 23 | 07-11-2003 00:50 |
| Direct drive or Chain? | Suneet | Technical Discussion | 32 | 27-03-2003 23:00 |
| Another chapter in the drive train story | AdamT | Technical Discussion | 19 | 29-09-2002 13:52 |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 29-01-2002 12:32 |