New divisions at nats?

[white_ChocOlat8]

Hypothetically speaking lets just say first added two new divisions as a way for more teams to come to nationals, what do you think they should be named?

[dez250]

not watt, if you want to know the story, ask Ron Partridge.

[RBrandy]

Maybe Write and Edison

Or maybe for next year, putting Einstein into the mix too.

[Dan Richardson]

Liebnitz and Pathagoras ( sp ? on both )

I would assume those would be pretty good ones.

[henryBsick]

Originally Posted by Stud Man Dan

Liebnitz and Pathagoras ( sp ? on both )

I would assume those would be pretty good ones.

All about Pythagorus!!!
Ohm
Watt-wait, nm, Mike.
Faraday
Volta
Armstrong- (osscilator guy, added a radio coil)
Galvany (sp..?)
Franklin- Oh yeah, the big 100.

And the all important.....
Baker
or.......
Lavery

Lots of cool names out there. .
Sorry for the flood, I got carried away.

[abeD]

Staying on the Calculus Euler

And from Physics Tesla, hmm i also like Darwin

[Melissa Nute]

Faraday!

[dez250]

Originally Posted by Meli W.

Faraday!

We need a Faraday Field, i repeate, we need a Faraday Field...

[ngreen]

Originally Posted by dez250

We need a Faraday Field, i repeate, we need a Faraday Field...

or Coloumb field...

[abeD]

Why don't we just get into elementary particles and go with Quark Field

[Elgin Clock]

Socrates.. He was cool in that Bill and Ted's excellent adventure movie..

But, as you may already know.. We already have the Elgin Clock Division (honest, it's in there!!)

It's just that....somebody forgot to tell me.

[MikeDubreuil]

As a computer engineering student I'd like to see a Volta division.

[nerdcool64]

Pascal, Gutenburg, I would be really in favor of Wright or maybe even VanBraun.

[Andy Baker]

A few more...

Copernicus field

Da Vinci field

Strawberry field (they can serve lunch there, while listening to Beatles tunes)

Andy B.

[Karthik]

Originally Posted by Andy Baker

A few more...
Da Vinci field

You read my mind on that one Andy. Da Vinci was the man. He had his hands in everything. He was an engineer, mathematician, philosopher, anatomist, geologist, painter, sculptor and architect (Plus a bunch of other things as well). The term "renaissance man" was coined because of him (and a few of his contemporaries).

I mean, he painted the Mona Lisa, and developed theories on hydraulics and gearing. He painted the Last Supper, and designed the first helicopter. His genius was only limited by the time he lived in. Most of his inventions and ideas would only be fully appreciated long after his death.

For more information on some of his inventions go check out: http://www.lib.stevens-tech.edu/coll...ons/index.html

For information on his art, go take an art history course. It's the best way to gain a true appreciation of his impact on his time.

Whenever I think of Da Vinci I'm amazed by the range of his talents. There has never been a more intellectually well rounded person in history. I have a huge respect for anyone with artistic talents as is, but when you combine that greatness with technical savy. Wow.

Da Vinci was simply awesome. One of my old school idols.

/End Karthik's history rant...