|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Car Nack Predicts-1st for 2005
Car Nack Predicts #1 for 2005
There will Not be alliances with three teams per alliance in 2005. Car Nack has spoken |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts-1st for 2005
Quote:
Concerning Alliances, as I used to say often on these fori, "Let me say this about that..." I think that this is a pretty bold prediction. BUT, I think Car Nack may end up being right in spirit but technically wrong due to his wording. Had he said, "There will not be an 'extra' team in the alliances during the Elimination rounds." I think he may be on to something. I am not predicting that FIRST will not have 2-on-2 play but I think they might. In the event that they decide to have 3-on-3, I suppose that they would decided not to have an extra team on the Alliances for the Elims. In this case, I suppose Car Nack could be technically wrong but right in spirit. Time will tell... Joe J. |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts-1st for 2005
Car Nack,
Not to put too fine a point on it, but, ah... ...you're 0 for 1 at this point in the season ;-) I think you had better get some more predictions out there to help your batting average if you know what I mean. Actually, I think stand by my point that in spirit, Car Nack was right, but there is that problem with the wording of your prection... Joe J. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Car Nack Predicts #4 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 0 | 29-03-2004 11:18 |
| Car Nack Predicts #2 | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 1 | 06-02-2004 12:48 |
| Car Nack Predicts | Car Nack | Car Nack's Corner | 0 | 14-01-2004 10:57 |
| Car Nack Predicts | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 21:59 |
| Car Nack Predicts | Bill Beatty | Off-Season Events | 4 | 11-11-2001 12:12 |