|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Using 6 motors in a drive system?
If you were to put 6 motors in a robot just to drive it around for the 2 minutes and 15 seconds would you have enough battery for 1) The whole round and 2) For other things 3) A compressor ???
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
We did last year. You must have an efficient drive system and it also depends on how much you use other motors and how much your compressor runs.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
I think that the exide batteries are 18 amp-hours
|
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
It is important to note that when a battery is specified at 18 AH, that is for the current draw over a long period of time. For our battery, it was for 20 hours. When you draw more current, the battery has a lower capacity.
It's defintely worth your while to look at the battery's data sheet: http://www2.usfirst.org/2005comp/Specs/batex.pdf For our battery it is 18AH over 20hrs. Over 1 hour, it is only 10.8 hr. Looking at the discharge characteristics, At approximately 50 amps, it will last between 5 and 8 minutes. At 100-120 amps, you are probably getting close to the 2 minute 15 second match length. Also note that the 120 amp circuit breaker doesn't trip as soon as it reaches 120 amps. The data sheet is here: http://www2.usfirst.org/2004comp/Spe...it_Breaker.pdf The circuit breaker will actually allow 200+ amps for 10-20 seconds. It will also allow at least 140 amps for the full 2 minute match. With those two pieces of information, I have no doubt that it is possible to completely drain the battery in 2 minutes and 15 seconds without tripping the main 120 amp circuit breaker. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
Quote:
In 2002, the 60 A circuit breaker was a major liability; we removed the two drill motors at our second event (and used the CIMs and Johnson F-Ps), after several breaker-throwing episodes. (Incidentally, we needed a 2-speed, badly, that year.) In 2003 with a single-speed transmission, all but the most hard-fought matches were handled easily, with no breaker issues (on the more rugged 120 A main breaker); however, matches with more than a minute of consistent pushing would reduce the robot to 6 or 7 V under load, and disable the robot controller. We once managed to push one reasonably powerful opponent up and over the ramp, from our end zone to theirs, before running out of juice, and ourselves getting pushed most of the way back. (Consider that my only driving mistake.... ) The breaker never tripped. For high-speed driving (and the robot was geared rather high), it was very driveable, and extremely responsive.In 2004, the robot was given a 2-speed gearbox, and though (in hindsight), the gear ratios were too far apart, it demonstrated superb speed and pushing power, while never encountering a power consumption issue. (Batteries were, however, religiously changed after every match; there was no desire to find ourselves short on power.) The bottom line: it's never been easier to do it, because of the four CIMs, and, if you don't want to put those motors elsewhere, it's a nice place to make use of them. Remember, if you have trouble, you can always remove the offending motors! Last edited by Tristan Lall : 12-01-2005 at 22:28. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using 6 motors in a drive system?
Quote:
Answer: Yes. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Drive system | rcubes85 | Control System | 8 | 12-01-2005 22:32 |
| Globe gear box | Pat Roche | Motors | 9 | 25-05-2004 22:50 |
| how does crab drive work? | Soukup | Technical Discussion | 13 | 25-04-2003 11:31 |
| Direct drive or Chain? | Suneet | Technical Discussion | 32 | 27-03-2003 23:00 |
| Swerve Drive | Jeff Waegelin | Technical Discussion | 14 | 17-09-2001 08:06 |