3 motor drive train

[nuggetsyl]

I was wondering if teams will start going to 3 motor drive trains since first made it sooooooo easy to have 2 motor drive trains.

[phrontist]

Originally Posted by nuggetsyl

I was wondering if teams will start going to 3 motor drive trains since first made it sooooooo easy to have 2 motor drive trains.

Why would you use an odd number of drive motors?!

[Rod]

3 per side. 6 Total.

[Alyna]

Wouldnt that be a 6WD?

[Mohsin]

well wouldn't it be a waste of power, as well as weight, because, the weight of the gearbox that FIRST gave us this year is heavy, imagine adding another moter to, as well as the gears needed to get the ratio and the speed right. and the power part, well six motors drawing the power all at the same time, which 2 motors could do, or even 4 is, well alot, leaving little power for the arm, but it might work if you are a pushing robot only. also the chances of something breaking or screwing up are greatly increased. which is always bad in the competion.

Mohsin
Team 772
If it aint broke, get INCENTIVE

[Cory]

Originally Posted by Mohsin

well wouldn't it be a waste of power, as well as weight, because, the weight of the gearbox that FIRST gave us this year is heavy, imagine adding another moter to, as well as the gears needed to get the ratio and the speed right. and the power part, well six motors drawing the power all at the same time, which 2 motors could do, or even 4 is, well alot, leaving little power for the arm, but it might work if you are a pushing robot only. also the chances of something breaking or screwing up are greatly increased. which is always bad in the competion.

Mohsin
Team 772
If it aint broke, get INCENTIVE

Im going to go out on a limb here and guess that with efficient weight reduction, you could make a 6 motor transmission that weighed the same amount as the current kitbot one, or slightly more. It's all a question of whether it fits the design criteria of your team's robot.

What do you mean by power? Draining the battery? sure, it does, but any team that makes a 6 motor drive will have considered that and deemed it an acceptable penalty.

You don't need motors for arms, you can use pneumatics, and there's still multiple motors left over if you use 6 drive motors.

[ebenhopwil]

Would a 6-motor drive train offer any significant advantage over a 4-motor? It wouldn't be any faster, but you would get more torque. But wouldn't you also need some hi-traction wheels to take advantage of that torque? And then there's the extra weight...

So my question is... is it worth it?

[Cory]

Originally Posted by ebenhopwil

Would a 6-motor drive train offer any significant advantage over a 4-motor? It wouldn't be any faster, but you would get more torque. But wouldn't you also need some hi-traction wheels to take advantage of that torque? And then there's the extra weight...

So my question is... is it worth it?

You can have a higher top speed, with more torque at that speed than a drive system with fewer motors would have.

[Stephen.Yanczura]

Or some high traction treads . BTW I would like to thank JVN personally for creating his spreadsheet motor calculator. It helped me tremendously in designing my teams gearbox this year. John, i'll be shaking your hand at one of the competitions, good work man.

[sanddrag]

Originally Posted by ebenhopwil

It wouldn't be any faster, but you would get more torque.

Please everyone read JVN's post previously in this thread. It is all in how you gear it. Very few conclusions about drive systems can be made in general. You can go much faster with a six motor drive, you can much slower. You can have lots more torque, or a lot less. Adding more anything (motors, gears, etc) to a drive system doesn't amount to any generality other than more weight, but even that is debatable.

If we are looking to discuss a specific drive system, lets do so but lets refrain from making such general coments as "it wouldn't be any faster."

[Mohsin]

Originally Posted by Cory

Im going to go out on a limb here and guess that with efficient weight reduction, you could make a 6 motor transmission that weighed the same amount as the current kitbot one, or slightly more. It's all a question of whether it fits the design criteria of your team's robot.

What do you mean by power? Draining the battery? sure, it does, but any team that makes a 6 motor drive will have considered that and deemed it an acceptable penalty.

You don't need motors for arms, you can use pneumatics, and there's still multiple motors left over if you use 6 drive motors.

remember the CMI motors have weight, and if you use the other motors, the gears would have to use weight, but as for pneumatics well if you want to use them a lot, a compressor would be the best choice, but it adds weight and drains more power from the batteries, we found that out last year. and i will agree with you in the desigh criteria, whatever you wnat and think best suits your needs, build it

Mohsin
Team 772
Civil Engineers = Tree Huggers

[Swampdude]

From what I can tell (since I've never built a 3 or even a 2 motor transmission) the only thing to gain from a 3 motor transmission would be to push hard at high speed. After seeing the coefficient factor of different wheel types, your going to be hard pressed to keep any wheel/tread from breaking loose with 4 motors. I may be off ( I did some math, but I don't completely trust it ) I think if you took the kit bot setup and also used the highest traction wheels you could find (what's been used in the past anyway, unless you've got some new space age material you need to tell me about) - all 4 cims - 21-28 sprockets - You're still going to be able to break the wheels loose in a pushing match. That's without shifting - plain ole kit gearboxes. So, putting another motor on there... If you wanted to break your tires loose while pushing at 5'/s maybe? OK but why? Usually your just trying to hold some ground, not send an opponent into orbit. Or maybe you want to go 20'/s but you could forget about controlling it. Maybe you'll get close to stall if you increase your weight with a bunch of tetras or using the opponent bots weight to leverage it. Anyhow, like John said - I think most of the hype on 3 motors is just that - hype. Do the math and you'll see. I know of a team that seriously knows what they're doing, and they're considering 1 cim/side , 3 speed NBD's and tank treads.
Although we did modify the kit gearboxes to take the FP motors (and lightened them up), just because we could. They haven't been run with 3 motors yet, but it will be fun just to see how they perform. We aren't planning to use them for our competition bot though. If anyones interested in how to do this it's pretty easy. You need to mill that fat 50 tooth in half. Then you can put a 60 tooth 32 pitch gear on the end of one of the cim shafts. We welded the 14 tooth to the 60 tooth, then key it back on the cim shaft. Then you penetrate the other side of the gearbox for the FP to mate with that 60 tooth. It took us 2 days to do it. Maybe later in the season I'll host a vid of our comp bot pushing the 6 motor practice bot around

[MasonMM]

well on a similar note. 118 is actually going with only 3 chips powering all 4 wheels. Although they arn't coupled, you still can say it's a 3 motor drive train.

[sanddrag]

Originally Posted by MasonMM

well on a similar note. 118 is actually going with only 3 chips powering all 4 wheels. Although they arn't coupled, you still can say it's a 3 motor drive train.

Care to enlighten us on exactly how this will work. It sounds very intriguing.

[MasonMM]

Originally Posted by sanddrag

Care to enlighten us on exactly how this will work. It sounds very intriguing.

well its a swerve/crab drive and only three of the wheel boxes are powered by chips. The forth wheel box just turns via the steering motor (separate from the drive motors) and drags along for the ride.