|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: pneumatic motors or other for your arm? | |||
| motors |
|
64 | 85.33% |
| pneumatics |
|
35 | 46.67% |
| other |
|
4 | 5.33% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
arm design
for your arms do you plan on using pneumatics or motors or other?
i ask just to see some of the other ideas out there, we have already designed our arm and i am just curious... |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: arm design
Team 647 will be using a motor powered arm. Also you may want to make this into a poll to be able to view the results easier.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: arm design
We're using motors, pneumatics are a maybe...
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: arm design
We will be using pneumatics for our arms
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: arm design
ok the poll is in, happy voting everyone!
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: arm design
We are using pneumatics and motors for our arm.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: arm design
i knew i forgot an option...does anyone know how to edit a poll to add another option? if not select other in this case, also if you select other please state the specifics.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: arm design
we, team 118, are going with a mix between motors and pnuematics. with a few peices of sugical tubing and zipties to help along the way.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: arm design
My team, 399, is using motors and possibly pneumatic assist if we see it is necessary.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: arm design
Motors with pnumatic grabber. I think our robot will surprise some people this year or at least turn heads, both in terms of capability, and in terms of improvement from last year. Overkill would be a nice way of summing it up. =p
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: arm design
The main lifting force is a fischer price motor. Pneumatics though are involved in grabbing of tetras and the on field assembly of our arm(it folds up first.)
~Ian |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: arm design
our team is thinking of using a mix of pneumatics and motors this year
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: arm design
i think pneumatics is simply better, if you are able to make it stop where you wanted. becasue motors may fry or brake down, and pneumatics are simpler to intsall, but if you are building a arm that move only by pneumatics, you will run out of air quickly.
Motor+Pneumatics |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: arm design
we're by passing pneumatics all together............too heavy for simple single use applications.
motors and ingenuity for us! |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: arm design
pneumatics are more powerful but its an all or nothing solution. you can't stop them halfway through, so if a tetra is just out of place then it may be difficult to pick it up
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Arm Design Input -- Four Bar Linkages | Sachiel7 | Technical Discussion | 4 | 18-01-2005 01:29 |
| pic: arm design | Stephen P | Extra Discussion | 17 | 17-01-2005 13:53 |
| Telescopic Arm and grabber design help | M. Hicken | Technical Discussion | 13 | 17-01-2005 12:56 |
| Arm design - rotation mechanism? | n0cturnalxb | Technical Discussion | 6 | 16-01-2005 18:28 |
| Reflected Inertia? | archiver | 2001 | 9 | 24-06-2002 03:50 |