|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Seeing as it's getting closer to the kick-off, and everyone's gearing up for the next season, I'd thought I'd ask what everyone would like to see change as far as programming goes.
Here's mine:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Hey, even as a an amatuer programmer, more speed! It would be nice to be able to to more intensive math without crashing the control code. And maybe hardware enabled floating point.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Only thing I want is a longer autonomous period and more sensors in the KOP. I like the current controllers though it would be nice if the compiler worked natively on Linux.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
I really like the open source dashboard.
One can always use small, cheap Parallax or Microchip controllers for sensor input/computation, and not worry about using the main RC for that. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Quote:
EDIT: I'm going to wish for more program space. I have a feeling the project I'm working on is going to take up a good amount between autonomous code, user-driven code, serial communication code, eeprom code, etc. Last edited by Mike : 30-10-2005 at 23:23. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Its been a while since have though about FRC code but:
I doubt they are going to make any hardware changes but i am going to wish for a 16bit PIC anyway. Access to at least 1 whole set of GPIO pins would be great In addition, i think the base code could use some radical changes in the way of abstraction and modulalarity. We probably rewrote 60% of it last year. More memory. FLASH, RAM. There are a number of pics that would be almost drop in replacements that would meet this criteria. Last edited by Rickertsen2 : 30-10-2005 at 18:59. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Quote:
-Kevin |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
I'd like to see more of an event-driven framework, or at least something that doesn't look like autonomous mode is an afterthought.
And I'd really like to see the limit_mix() function die. ![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Quote:
Matt |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
No more MPLAB.
Give us support for something else.... anything else... just no more MPLAB. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Well, there is support for other things thanks to the work of others. Search for "using eclipse."
What I would like to see:
Last edited by Ryan M. : 31-10-2005 at 19:00. Reason: I lied... it's not in his sig. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
At this point, USB is becoming a necessity. When i bought my laptop over the summer, there was not a single computer in the store with a serial port.
Requiring the user to buy extra hardware just to acheive baseline functionality from a product is not acceptable. As much as it pains me, i think serial ports are dying. That said, the USB port needs to be IN ADDITION to the serial port. The serial port on the RC is very useful and i have used it for many things othe than just programming and sending data to the computer. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Coders' Wishlists for 2006
Quote:
Perhaps we could compromise: release the default code a few weeks before kickoff, provided it doesn't reveal the game. Then, people would have time to create "preferable" versions of it. Last edited by Ryan M. : 01-11-2005 at 14:36. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|