|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
bumpers, a problem?
problem with bumpers..
i saw that the center of the bumper is higher than the center of the ball, and that makes it possible that the bumpers will cuse the robot to roll over the ball and get it stuck underneath, if someone can explain this differently, i would appreciate it, cuz thats a big thing i see wrong |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
I don't really see this as a problem.
From R35, last bullet point at bottom: Quote:
The bottom of the bumper, covered with smooth material (required in the bumper rule) should not catch the balls. I think it'll be low enough to not cause problems. Just my take on it. JBotAlan |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
The center is higher than the center of the ball, but the bumpers can extend all the way down to 2 & 1/2", so there shouldn't really be problems rolling over balls unless a team doesn't extend all the way down to that level, I would think.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
You're correct...if the center of the bumper is higher than the center of the ball, the ball will roll under the robot, causing 2 different scenarios...1)the ball will cause the wheels to come off the ground, hendering any type of movement 2) the ball will cause only the front wheels to come off the ground, but as the robot moves forward, the ball forces the back wheels off the ground, but at the same time the front wheels are lowered back onto the ground
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
the bumpers are designed so that balls will not go under, as well as impact reduction.
FIRST does not want ball around wheels or in chain and sprockets. I can imagine a balls going under a robot, and a spray of foam pieces coming out the other side. oops. Last edited by Henry_Mareck : 14-01-2006 at 01:28. Reason: grammmaaaar! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
I seriously doubt the fact that FIRST would overlook a problem that could destroy their equipment for all the competitions.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
If bumpers can be 2.5 inches off the ground, and the center of the ball is at 3.5 inches (7 inch diameter i believe)........I don't see there being any problems.
Besides, i'm pretty sure that you can have other non-bumper material below 2.5 inches. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Quote:
or just steal some star wars repulsor lift coils ![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
I'd say that a hovercraft above 5 feet could be legal.....I'm pretty sure that the rule is that you cannot exceed 5 feet while in a STABLE POSITION (flat on the ground?)
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Quote:
That is a direct quote from the manual |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumpers, a problem?
Well, not to beat a dead horse, but I think if your robot is within the 60in cube during gameplay, unless you have a diagonal piece, tipping over would not put you outside of the limit. Lifting you up could, which is something you may want to look into if you're a tall robot and you're concerned of being lifted.
Hmm I assume the 60in is 60in from the ground? Ie...when you're on a ramp, its 60in from the top of the ramp instead of original playing field? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a realistic Statics Problem | sanddrag | Technical Discussion | 10 | 05-12-2005 15:07 |
| Problem w/Mesh | Kevin Thorp | 3D Animation and Competition | 4 | 17-02-2005 23:04 |
| Programming Problem: Extremely Frustrating | chantilly_team | Programming | 19 | 12-02-2005 23:00 |
| The problem with scouting... | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 23-06-2002 23:49 |
| Major problem with chipphua motors | aka Scott White | Motors | 18 | 19-03-2002 19:44 |