|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which Terminals?
Hey!
I know that last year, we had to have specific terminals on the batteries, fuse block, and on/off switch (circuit breaker). They were the copper ones with the screws on them. Does anyone know if we still have to use these this year? (we haven't found anything in the manual, but we want to be sure. It was really hectic trying to find them at the competitions.) If you could post, it would be much appreciated. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
Brittany,
The rules (per the robot manual) have been relaxed a little this year. You may use SLU 35 terminals ( a smaller version of last year's terminal) or you may use a suitable crimp terminal if you wish. As always, insulate all electrical connections on the robot, particularly the battery and main power distro and main circuit breaker. <R54> The EX18-12 Battery, the Main 120 Amp Circuit Breaker, and the Circuit Breaker distribution panels must be connected as shown in the 2006 ( or optionally) as in the 2005 diagrams shown below. The EX18-12 Battery must use the Anderson Connector. The connector must be attached with either the copper SLU-35 lugs provided in the Terminal Supply Bag or appropriate crimp-on lug connectors. The Battery terminals and the connecting lugs must be insulated with shrink tubing and/or electrical tape |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
Quote:
Last year they made us change all of our #6 crimp connectors to the copper lugs. Reading the rule book, I thought it said we could use crimps again this year, but I wasn't sure. Just to clarify, though, can we use crimps on the batteries as well? Thanks, -Chris |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
Quote:
As a side note here...Since all robot current is passing through these connections (battery, main breaker, gound and breaker panel feeds) you need to be very sure of the connection. We crimp and then solder before insulating with heat shrink. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
We've run into a problem here.... Since we're using last year's distro panel, the SLU-35 lugs have too small of a hole to fit onto the bolt on the distro panel. Which would be the legal way to do this... Drill out the SLU-35's hole so it fits the bolt, or use last year's SLU-45 lugs?
EDIT: Was it SLU-75 last year? I can't remember off the top of my head. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
The rules say to use the SLU-35s or appropriate crimp on connectors. The rules don't say that SLU-70s are legal. This is a nit, but they hung a lot of teams on the rules requiring SLU-70s last year. Legal terminals were a hot commodity in the pits last year. Posting a QandA on this one would be appropriate...
Eugene |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
Quote:
attachments) or the SLU-35s (for the number 10 attachments): clean them, screw them, SOLDER THEM, and shrink them! We went so far as to tin plate ours last year, to make the soldering go easier. It takes a BIG soldering iron. Eugene |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Which Terminals?
We drilled a couple of the 35's in the second week or so, but now that I know the 70's are legal I'll be using those... I don't mind drilling them out, but I don't like how it thins out two of the walls, so I'll just use untouched 70's.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Rule R48 and SLU-70 Copper Terminals Information | Rich Wong | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 2 | 29-03-2005 17:20 |
| Restricted to the Anderson Connectors in the Kit? | sanddrag | Electrical | 15 | 20-01-2005 11:36 |
| Spikes | Denman | Control System | 17 | 16-11-2004 07:51 |
| a word of advice when wiring or rewiring motors with solderless terminals | pryoplasm | Electrical | 12 | 06-04-2004 11:04 |
| Current Sensor Output | Controls1317 | Electrical | 5 | 01-02-2004 23:45 |