|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Maximum PWM length
What is the maximum length you can run a PWM cable without loosing the signal? We are looking at running some sensors and servoss with cables maybe 3 or 5 feet in length, and I want to make sure the signal will make it.
Last edited by mechanicalbrain : 20-02-2006 at 02:18. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Maximum PWM length
That should be no problem.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Maximum PWM length
I agree with Al that you should be alright, but i swear i remember reading in something IFI wrote (i dont remember if it was in their forums or in a whitepaper or a datasheet or what) that they said that PWM wires should not be longer then 5 feet.
If i can find the exact document i will edit this and link it. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Maximum PWM length
The only issue with length should be signal interference. In 2002, we designed a remote "runner" mouse for our robot, and it had about 30 feet of cable running to it, with power for a motor, and a signal cable for a steering servo. With the long cables running right next to each other, the motor power cable would interfere badly with the steering of the servo, so we switched to shielded cable for the servo, and it worked fine.
Here's one of the photos of the runner. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Maximum PWM length
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Maximum PWM length
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| reading hobby PWM | sciguy125 | Programming | 2 | 17-10-2005 20:47 |
| FYI about using PWM 13-16 with interrupts | cabbagekid2 | Programming | 6 | 22-01-2005 00:54 |
| Using an Operator Interface with the 2004 EDU RC wirelessly | Dave Flowerday | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 34 | 19-04-2004 19:06 |
| pwm 13-15 | wayne 05 | Programming | 2 | 04-10-2003 12:08 |
| maximum length of joystick cables | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 23-06-2002 23:54 |