|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
2005 Electricals or 2006?
Did your team use the 2006 electrical setup from the kit, or did you order the 2005 breaker panel from IFI?
Why? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
Quote:
2005 - best US$ 84.95 spent this season, in my opinion. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
2005 breaker panel for weight
Maxi blocks weigh a ton |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
2005 set-up for sure. Makes everything neater, lighter, and more reliable in my opinion.
The weight of that maxi fuse block makes me cringe. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
We also used the 2005 Setup, less weight and it makes everything much cleaner in my opinion.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
Looks like 5 for 5, we used last years panel too. It's so much easier to wire up, and you can hook 6 40amp loads to it, not to say anything of the weight of the gold maxi holder.
-Chris |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
2005, for weight and layout efficiency.
Also, as an inspector I prefer 2005 because it makes wiring easier to trace. Can anyone offer some reason(s) for using the 2006 components, other than the extra cost of purchasing the 2005 breaker panel? |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
Make that 7 for 7. Makes it so much easier and neater. Separate blocks inhale audibly
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
2005 because it is what I would have designed if I were doing it. The electrical runs are straightforward, minimum loss, with monitoring and good electrical input posts. The high current positions are near the input terminal. I also like the fact that ground returns are numbered to match the fuse (output) positions and there are more positions than the smaller blocks. The Maxi blocks require some fudging to get a reliable contact on #6 (folding stranded wire is not a good way to fill the hole) although the distro block is an easy way for inexperienced electrical teams to get a good return connection.
|
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
Large one (2005). Space, 6 40 amp circuits, weight, ease of use.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
We used the 2005 panel, although having that ground stud on
board to use as a lift point for the robot might have been nice... Eugene |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
2005. I fought tooth and claw for it since the beginning of the season. Other team members were against it saying something about filipping it around in competition being hard.(I never did figure out what they meant) It's a good thing I "convinced" them that it was the better choice, we had to eliminate 15lbs (stupid bathroom scales in our shop said we were 10 under... next time I see them I'm going to bust out the bloody sledgehammer) at competition as it was, I'd hate to have to remove another one or two.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2005 Electricals or 2006?
2005, of course.
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 code on 2005 RC? | RedBarons | Programming | 1 | 04-03-2006 14:29 |
| 2006 Camera identical to 2005? | de_ | Programming | 6 | 23-01-2006 03:28 |
| CMUCam2 - 2005 vs 2006 changes | kmcclary | Programming | 1 | 09-01-2006 17:24 |
| 2005 - 2006 NASA FIRST Robotics Sponsorships | KathieK | Fundraising | 2 | 27-11-2005 11:04 |