|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The Canary Letter
So what do you guys think about the yellow card/ red card rule and having to carry the stigma of the yellow card for the rest of the tournament?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
I think this is an awesome addition! I'm glad they decided to implement it at all events. (We should all thank Andy Baker for starting this a few years back at the IRI) |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I think it's a good addition, it will be interesting to see how effective it's use is in competition. Hopefully this'll prevent aggressive teams from using potentially dangerous tactics.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I'm not a big fan, because it's a little vague. I mean, it's then up to the judge if a team is being too rough or not, which is much more subjective than before. Not that I'm saying my team is upset that we can't push people around like crazy. I just think it's less defined than before and open to interpretation.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Yes, It makes it so that one judge's decision is applied to an entire regional, and so that if a team makes one mistake in the beginning of a regional... They are penalized for the rest of it.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Technically it's not a penalty, rather, just a warning to watch for rough behavior. I find it hard that such behavior could occur accidentally. Keep an eye on your robot and if you see a referee making the pinning hand signals (it's hard to miss) back off.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
pinning isn't the only cause for a yellow card. also it isn't always cut and dry, things like ramming are largely a matter of interpretation. This rule would have worked better last year with the cut and dry definitions of the bumper zone and the lack of need for teams to have anything extending past the bumpers. this year however, the arms and manipluators will most likely reach well beyond the bumper zone.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
?my only thoughts on this are that I might feel a little better about this rule if the card only carried over for a set number (for example, 4, matches), to keep teams from playing half-heartedly out fo fear of a DQ. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
what would be considered good defense. how far can you go with out getting a card?
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I like the abillity to shock a team into compliance with the card, but...
Something deep down inside is nagging me about carrying this 'mark' the whole weekend. Any parallels here to the "scarlet Letter"? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
What will be interesting is how much the yellow card is used. Depending on the interpertation of rough play, there could potentially be a Regional with a number of robots all with yellow cards. Somehow I think the value of the yellow card will be diminished if 10 out of 30 teams at a regional have one.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
Besides, why discourage teams from playing a good defense--yes, people make accidents; but in saying that they basically get one shot and then they're disqualified--that sounds a bit over the edge to me. People make accidents, and I don't think they shouldn't be penalized that much for such things. Not to mention that I have qualms with such a subjective penalty system. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
The rules have always been there - 10 point penalties, warning, then disqualification. Referees have always handed out warnings to teams to prevent poor strategies. Until now only the team that received the warning, the referee that gave the warning, and the head ref were the only ones to know about them. All this new system is doing is making the warnings more visible to the crowd and the other referees. This yellow card system is NOT making any new rules. If you haven't received warnings before for an action, you probably won't receive a yellow card now. This will only prevent teams from being warned multiple times without something being done to stop the aggressive behavior. Teams have always had 2 strikes, but it hasn't always been enforced due to lack of communication. Once again, the rules aren't changing, only the enforcement (and visibility) of them is. P.S. - Good defense has always been allowed. Agressive defense never has (though some teams get away with it when refs are looking the other way). |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 06-01-2007 at 20:59. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: A letter from U.S.FIRST to sponsors, before the initial year | Andy Baker | Extra Discussion | 6 | 15-11-2006 13:38 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Letter to FRC teams from the United States Department of Commerce | dez250 | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 5 | 16-05-2005 22:47 |
| The Continuous Letter Sentence Game | xtremedarkness | Games/Trivia | 38 | 11-02-2005 10:12 |
| Dean Simmons and the Kamens Letter, Post IRI | Amanda Morrison | Off-Season Events | 4 | 14-07-2004 16:19 |