|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What is better | |||
| Ramp Bot |
|
56 | 39.72% |
| Arm Bot |
|
65 | 46.10% |
| Something Else |
|
47 | 33.33% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Ramp - bot vs. Arm bot
For those who are not familiar with this year’s FIRST Robotics Competition’s game this year (Rack and Roll), please go to this link before reading this post. This will bring you to the animation that every team in the FIRST Robotics Competition watched on Kickoff on January 6, 2007. mms://sargasso-3.arc.nasa.gov/2007/first/010607kickoff.wmv For a more detailed description of the rules, please visit this link http://www2.usfirst.org/2007comp/Man...FRC_Manual.zip Now back to my original question: What is better for the FIRST Robotics 2007 Competition, a ramp - bot or a robot that has an arm with no ramp? This is the question that was discussed at our team’s meetings during the first week after kickoff. An arm may be able to score on the Spider Rack but if the ringers are spoiled it will not help the team a lot. Also if the Spider Rack is shaking, it will be much harder for the robots to put the keepers, ringers, and spoilers on the spider racks. Of course if your robot excels in using an arm or some way to score on the Spider racks, then that will not affect you too much. Conversely, a Ramp - bot will not be able to score well (if at all) on the Spider Rack. So I would guess that each Ramp - - bot would play defense on the opposing alliance for most of the game. The key attribute of the Ramp - - bot is that is that it can elevate its two alliance partners 4 or 12 inches off the ground at the end of the match. This is extremely important because for each robot that is elevated 4-11.9 inches off of the ground, the alliance is awarded 15 bonus points. For each robot that is elevated 12 inches or more off of the ground, the alliance is awarded 30 bonus points. That is a lot of points if the alliances have trouble scoring on the spider racks, then the alliance with the ramp - - bot will have 30- 60 points (if the robots are able to get up the ramp). I personally think that the ramp - bot is a better robot, because if you can guarantee 60 points for each game, then you have a pretty good chance of winning the match. This is just my opinion but I would love to hear what everyone else’s opinion and/or criticism. As a Team that will be competing at a Regional and the National Competition, we would like to know what the consensus of other teams or just people interested in FIRST Robotics. To all Teams that will be competing in the FIRST Robotics 2007 Competition, good luck! P.S. I am a proud member of Team 250 from Upstate New York. I encourage you to visit our website (http://team250.org/2006/index.php) or e-mail me at m.rossi@team250.org |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
The best bots will be able to do both.
As I see it in the finals there are 16 spots for arm bots and 8 for ramp/ lift bots. The teams That will seed highest will have very effective manipulators and will score most of their points on the rack. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
The problem I see with only Ramp/Defensive bots is that you are at the mercy of your alliance. The more robots that can lift other robots, the more interesting the Rack becomes. Think about it, if both sides can lift then everything depends on the Rack.
5 in a row gets you 32 pts negating one lifted robot. One more negates the second lifted robot(both over 12 inches). So should you try to get a row of 6 or try to lift 2 bots up 12 inches? One thing is certain this game requires very dynamic strategies that can change in at any second. Last edited by 6600gt : 19-01-2007 at 20:44. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Quote:
Also I don't think that many alliances are going to be able to get a row of 5 or 6 with out it being screwed up by a spoiler. So I don't think that a long rows will be a big problem |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Quote:
Quote:
In the beginning I also believed that the clearance is going to a challenge but when you consider that fact that the ringer is flexible 30 degrees offset hanging is not going to be terribly difficult... Last edited by 6600gt : 19-01-2007 at 21:38. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
A ramp bot does not guarantee an alliance any points during a match. You must rely on your alliance to score any points. This is why I believe an arm bot is better, because you can score points as an individual robot.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Its all a matter of population.
Why would you want multiple ramp-bots on the same alliance? Ring-bots will always be in greater demand then ramp-bots. (Of course if everyone follows this logic, we will be in trouble ) |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
that is the problem. unless you go team by team asking what are you guys doing, then you just have to bring whatever you have to regionals and do what you say you were going to do.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
What about a both bot ??
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
If it can do both reliably, all the better.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
That is our goal. You know how that goes. Weight might be a problem.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
We thought about that too. But we came to the conclusion that it would be better to focus on one attribute and make that work perfectly. If there is time later then maybe we will try to use the attribute we left out (the arm or ramp). But honestly that is very unlikely so I personally think that we should just go with our idea and hope that our alliance partners will be complimentry to our robot. Like Dominicano0519 said, unless you plan on asking every team, then there is no way of knowing who will be building what kind of robot.
By the way, I noticed that some of the replies cam from people who are going to the Finger Lakes Regional. Team 250 will also be competing at RIT, so I will see you there! Good Luck! |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Just something that I forgot to ask: For those of you that voted "Something else" on the poll, what did you mean? I would love to know...just to see what what you thought up.
Thanks! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Being able to lift two robots 12 inches every round definitely does not guarantee 60 points every round. There are many instances when one of your alliance partners may tip over, become immobile, or just might not be able to get back to the end zone in time.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ramp bot vs. Arm bot
Well, our conclusion to this was to build a bot with an arm. To have a bot with an operable arm guarantees points for your alliance. To build a ramp bot you really are dependent on your alliance to get up on you, not fall down on their side, not be ramp bots too, and have the ability to score points without you helping offensively. SO, in my opinion it is a good idea to build an arm with as few degrees of freedom as possible and can place a tube on the spider leg in one swoop. Then, if you get your arm working smoothly with time left in the building season, build your ramp. The only pro for a ramp bot is that it can be an effective defense player
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Arm Placement on Bot? | Po-ser | Technical Discussion | 7 | 13-01-2007 15:19 |
| Dr. Bot | JamizzleHavok13 | NASA Discussion | 0 | 28-03-2005 14:33 |
| Bot blocks field with arm in LZ - Penalties? | Swampdude | Rules/Strategy | 8 | 02-03-2005 15:00 |
| S.P.A.M. 05 BOT | tiffany34990 | Robot Showcase | 14 | 09-02-2005 11:04 |
| Stretcher Bot | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 02:42 |