|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
best winning alliances
who do u think from the regionals had the best winning alliance say if they got together at nationals who do u think would win
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
I have a feeling that many people will say the LA regional champions, 254, 330, and 4.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
Most likely teams that are in the same division.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
![]() I'm biased |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
I don't think any of the regional winners would stand a very good shot together at Championship.
Maybe 25, 103, and 1302 or 254, 330, 4...but both of those are still a stretch. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
Quote:
As much I hate to say it I agree, here's what I see happenning. 573 + 1730 + another good robot = OWNAGE!!! |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
Quote:
However, if you were to take each regional-winning alliance and make a bracket up, then I could definitely see the 4/254/330 alliance going pretty far. Ditto for the 86/1251/1270 alliance to emerge out of UCF; none of those robots are anything to mess around with. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: best winning alliances
have not seen them play,but teams 123 and 247 have teamed up for two regional wins already. detroit and pa.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
Well... I don't see any three exact teams getting back together from regionals. Let alone them winning it all. However, I do think that there will be one surprise team in there somewhere that hasn't won anything yet as the third or first alliance pick or picker.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
67, 340, & 1126... oh wait this isn't 2004.
never mind. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
This has been the most unpredictable game I have seen in my six years in FIRST. And one thing that really stands out is that no matter how good a robot is it's never going to be good enough to carry and allince to victory all by itself. You need a complete alliance, a good plan and lots of luck.
I actually bet one of the champion teams will be somebody no one saw comming (like 296 and 522 last year. No one was talking about them before the weekend began). |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: best winning alliances
i would actually say that our alliance 1730, 234, and 1555 would be a very strong alliance...we have the defense...and then two great offensive robots
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: best winning alliances
I would like to see a repeat of my favorite alliance of all time, when we won nationals, it was 67, 330, 503. All of our machines this year are great so maybe we'll get lucky again...
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: best winning alliances
A repeat of a complete alliance winning again is astronomical. Like Koko Ed said, this game is incredibly unpredictable. I mean, look at GLR. 1114 and 67 were objectively the most explosive tube scoring robots. They were on fire and somehow lost (i beleive there were some battery problems on thier alliance). Or what about Detroit? A robot without an arm or ramps was the number 1 seed?
The only thing i can think of is a 247 123 hookup. They have been pretty continuous. winning two regionals in the same year together is rare, but in this game they somehow did it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Alliances @ Nationals | NeedMoreEngines | Championship Event | 2 | 18-04-2005 18:56 |
| Division Alliances | Jeff Rodriguez | Championship Event | 18 | 19-04-2004 01:57 |
| BUCKEYE Alliances | soap108 | Regional Competitions | 2 | 09-03-2003 12:59 |
| Alliances in touble? | archiver | 2000 | 24 | 23-06-2002 22:46 |
| alliances | archiver | 1999 | 49 | 23-06-2002 22:43 |