Regional Data: Tubes scored by each team.

[Joel J]

Hey scouts-- if you still have this data lying around, could you please share?

[Joel J]

SVR data posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...6&postcount=28

TeamId ScoreAvg
100 3.5
114 3.375
254 3.125
852 2.375
668 2.125
987 2.125
604 2
971 1.875
368 1.625
692 1.625
2024 1.5
190 1.375
1280 1.25
115 1.125
1560 1
192 1
2141 0.875
846 0.875
2035 0.75
766 0.625
1544 0.5
1693 0.5
253 0.5
1458 0.25
8 0.25
973 0.25
2135 0.14285715
840 0.14285715
256 0.125
581 0.125
1070 0
1351 0
1516 0
1570 0
1700 0
1834 0
1868 0
1967 0
1970 0
2144 0
362 0
488 0
568 0
624 0
649 0
670 0
675 0
751 0

Chesapeake (but only top 10) posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=81

175 - 3.6
1629 - 3.5
836 - 3.4
293 - 3.2
768 - 3.2
1418 - 3.2
75 - 3
341 - 2.6
1727 - 2
614 - 1.7

San Diego (but only top 10) posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...6&postcount=99

Team Avg Tubes Min Max
330 5.00 3 8
1425 4.38 3 7
1622 3.89 2 7
368 3.44 1 5
1540 3.30 1 4
968 3.30 0 7
696 2.78 0 5
835 1.89 0 5
585 1.78 0 4
1572 1.78 0 4

Wisconsin (top few) posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=111

1736 3.7
537 2.55
1732 2.15
2052 2.09
1623 2

Buckeye (top few) posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=111

1038 4.13
494 4
1126 3.67
451 3.13
70 3
191 2.88
291 2.88
65 2.56
537 2.55
548 2.5

GLR posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=113
BTW-- It was requested that I add the belief that GLR's data is a bit misleading. That is the total for some teams represents 6 played matches, and other 7 or 8. So there isn't a constant denominator to average these scores with.

Ramp Rankings			Rack Rankings	
				
TEAM #	BOTS UP RANK	TEAM #	RINGERS
57	4	1	1114	28
66	3	2	67	27
453	3	3	503	25
67	3	4	573	24
279	2	5	33	23
1213	2	6	65	23
1941	2	7	326	19
815	2	8	1015	18
548	1	9	1023	15
1188	1	10	1503	15
2137	1	11	70	14
240	1	12	201	14
1528	1	13	1504	12
33	1	14	1701	12
1	1	15	322	11
308	1	16	1674	11
1023	1	17	451	11
322	1	18	862	10
1243	1	19	815	10
469	1	20	1596	9
1549	1	21	548	8
503	1	22	494	8
2163	1	23	910	8
1711	0	24	1243	7
1322	0	25	1	7
68	0	26	448	7
494	0	27	818	7
226	0	28	1254	6
313	0	29	68	5
448	0	30	2163	5
519	0	31	1213	5
1254	0	32	308	5
280	0	33	1188	4
1504	0	34	1322	4
573	0	35	280	4
1674	0	36	1896	3
326	0	37	830	3
70	0	38	469	2
818	0	39	835	2
1189	0	40	1711	1
830	0	41	1189	1
451	0	42	1549	0
406	0	43	66	0
1286	0	44	406	0
201	0	45	894	0
1503	0	46	226	0
894	0	47	519	0
65	0	48	1528	0
903	0	49	453	0
1596	0	50	470	0
910	0	51	2137	0
1701	0	52	440	0
1015	0	53	57	0
1896	0	54	313	0
440	0	55	1941	0
470	0	56	279	0
1114	0	57	903	0
835	0	58	240	0
862	0	59	1286	0

NJ posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=121

Team #: Sum of tubes scored:
25 24
836 20
103 20
75 17
1403 16
177 16
1218 15
359 15
237 14
716 13
293 12
223 12
375 10
341 9
1672 7
816 7
2016 6
1807 6
11 6
555 6
486 6
1302 5
613 5
88 4

Boston (top few) posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=122

Team #: Sum of tubes scored:
88 28
126 26
1403 23
69 23
121 22
1626 21
1100 19
125 17
2079 16
1350 16

Palmetto (top ten) posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=130

Rank    Team Number    # of Tubes    Avg per match    Final rank
1.          1626           33            4.125           4
2.          832            26            3.250           13
3.          1251           25            3.571           1
4.          1746           23            2.875           10
5.          342            22            2.750           27
6.          343            22            2.750           5
7.          34             21            3.00            23
8.          587            21            2.625           45
9.          1249           18            2.571           16
10.         1319           17            2.125           2

[themagic8ball]

The MARRS Data for Wisconsin and Buckeye for 537 is averaged for both regionals.

At Wisconsin we did 2.09 per match.

At Buckeye it was 3.11 per match.

Both numbers are based solely on Qualifiction matches and a smaller number of elimination matches.

[slickguy2007]

I don't remember ever seeing so much coordinated scouting in all my years in FIRST. You guys really take GP to the max.

[Dan Petrovic]

I was about to post all of the data from Boilermaker... but suddenly Firefox closed.

I had a little overview that stated that 573 scored the most rings in the qualifying matches that we scouted (we didn't scout them all). They scored 3 more than 45, however 45 was defended against in 5 of the 9 matches we scouted. 573 was only defended in one of their matches we scouted.

45 stands up better to defense than 573. When 573 was being defended, they scored two. The lowest 45 scored while being defended was 3.

166 scored 17 rings in 9 matches, but we were defended in 7 of those matches We were defended against more than any other team at Boilermaker.
We probably would have scored more if there wasn't so much defense played on us.

Other good scorers include:
1023
85
1730
234
931
868

I post actual data later when I feel compelled to do all that work over again. I have averages and everything!

[Chuck Glick]

if anyone has philly data I would love to see it. I personally want to see how many my team did, because, well I am the driver . And I want to see how other teams did.

[Swampdude]

Maybe somebody can unscramble this for UCF info:

He posted it as a text file, but it doesn't look right as that or as an .xls
But it think it counts caps for Fridays matches.

[Joel J]

Originally Posted by Swampdude

Maybe somebody can unscramble this for UCF info:

He posted it as a text file, but it doesn't look right as that or as an .xls
But it think it counts caps for Fridays matches.

*.rtf, I believe.

It opened properly for me in WordPad.

[MasterChief 573]

Originally Posted by InfernoX14

I was about to post all of the data from Boilermaker... but suddenly Firefox closed.

I had a little overview that stated that 573 scored the most rings in the qualifying matches that we scouted (we didn't scout them all). They scored 3 more than 45, however 45 was defended against in 5 of the 9 matches we scouted. 573 was only defended in one of their matches we scouted.

45 stands up better to defense than 573. When 573 was being defended, they scored two. The lowest 45 scored while being defended was 3.

166 scored 17 rings in 9 matches, but we were defended in 7 of those matches
We probably would have scored more if there wasn't so much defense played on us.

Other good scorers include:
1023
85
1730
234
931
868

I post actual data later when I feel compelled to do all that work over again. I have averages and everything!

We really scored that much, I guess that's possible but I think that 1730 scored more. We found ourselves in some really interesting matches at BMR but we had a great time. Championships are gonna be great, Newton all the way!

[Dan Petrovic]

Originally Posted by MasterChief 573

We really scored that much, I guess that's possible but I think that 1730 scored more. We found ourselves in some really interesting matches at BLR but we had a great time. Championships are gonna be great, Newton all the way!

Nope. You guys scored the most rings in the Qualifiers.

In 8 matches 1730 scored 22. In 8 matches you guys scored 27.

Both of you were defended about the same as well.

And what's BLR? Is that a hybrid of BMR and GLR? Boilerlakes Regional?

[MasterChief 573]

Originally Posted by InfernoX14

Nope. You guys scored the most rings in the Qualifiers.

In 8 matches 1730 scored 22. In 8 matches you guys scored 27.

Both of you were defended about the same as well.

And what's BLR? Is that a hybrid of BMR and GLR? Boilerlakes Regional?

What are you talking about, my posts says BMR, I don't know what your thinking, shush nobody needs to know.

[T3_1565]

any data on the GTR? I wouldn't mind knowing how my team did (also the driver) lol I'm interested in seeing how we stood.