pic: Unique drive concept

[Joe G.]

loading photo ...

[Rosiebotboss]

That looks interesting......Can I assume the vertical 'big' CIM is used to turn the table for steering?

duh.....of course it is. I got to read your caption first. Please post any refinements. I'm going to bring this to my team's resident VEX expert for a prototype.

Shawn???? Are you reading this.

[SamC]

Originally Posted by Rosiebotboss

Can I assume the vertical 'big' CIM is used to turn the table for steering?

I think that is how it works...

Originally Posted by Original Photo Description

Basically, the center platform and center wheels are on a powered turntable (chain driven from CIM in back.)

[fredliu168]

thats really cool

I'm going to try that with VEX

[AdamHeard]

I'm not sure, but ball casters might have less friction than omniwheels

[seanl]

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

I'm not sure, but ball casters might have less friction than omniwheels

we had a bad history with casters this year. i wouldn't recommend it. that design is sort of present in our 05 bot. its not multi directional http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/20299
it shows it with
ball casters but. later we switched them out with omnis and personally its my favorite bot to drive. its a great idea i might want to try that out.

[Jonathan Norris]

Thats a really cool idea... I would also have to agree that ball casters would be a better idea then omni wheels.
My main concern with this idea is the torque required to move the center 'module', because most of your contact with the ground will come from those two middle wheels... and if they provide too much friction you may just end up turning the whole body of the robot. So instead of having a crab drive you have your robots body turreted.... with your center two wheels staying put...

To solve this you would have to either program the wheels to turn the direction your are trying to move the middle module, basically running the wheels in opposite directions helping the big CIM turn your center module. Or you may want to use omni wheels over the kit wheels...

This is defiantly something you would want to do some calculations and small prototyping to see if it would actually work, cool idea thou!

[Joe G.]

Originally Posted by Jonathan Norris

To solve this you would have to either program the wheels to turn the direction your are trying to move the middle module, basically running the wheels in opposite directions helping the big CIM turn your center module. Or you may want to use omni wheels over the kit wheels...

Yeah, I was thinking that omniwheels might be needed in the middle, but normal wheels are obviously preferable for traction reasons if it dosen't push backwards like you suggested. A prototype is really the only way to find out for sure. It'd probably have some programming compensation like you said too.

I agree with Lil' Lavery that ramp climbing is a problem, omniwheels or casters, but I have a few concepts to play around with for some kind of suspension.

[efoote868]

Last year when we were throwing around ideas for drivetrains and such, we came up with a concept similar to one drawn. We tossed it for the very reason that lavery posted, and also for the reason that if we ever got into a pushing match, the slightest bit of lift would lose it for us.

[David]

almost as maneuverable as my off season idea; spherebot

[Arefin Bari]

I think everyone else have covered most of the things about that base. The first thing that caught my eye was the 1x1 that is holding the powered module up. What is the thickness on that? Also... what is the thickness of the shaft that is coming out (going into that 1x1) to connect to the sprocket (in order to turn)? I am assuming its 1/2". Are you worried about that 1x1 bending/sheering? How much does it weigh as is in the picture?

Very interesting concept. I hope after some modifications on the drawing you will be able to manufacture this and share the outcomes. Good luck.

[Simon Strauss]

http://www.firstroboticscanada.org/site/node/372

http://www.firstroboticscanada.org/site/node/323

Im guessing you already knew about these when comming up with the design, but my advice is to try to contact whoever did these and discuss the pro's and con's with them.

There used to be more pictures of similar drive methods but they seem to have been lost when waterloo moved all its info to FIRSTroboticsCanada

-Simon

[Lil' Lavery]

Very interesting concept, a nice simplified swerve concept. I think I may also try and find the parts/money to try and test it with Vex (although the bushing around the base of the drive will probably be hard to reproduce, I might have to prototype it without it).
Some thoughts to consider:
As it stands, this drive will have difficulty climbing ramps/inclines/large(r) steps. When the leading set of wheels starts to go up the incline, the drive wheels will be lifted off the ground, and the bot will roll back down. If you added some form of suspension to the omnis, this could possibly fix the situation, but that increases the weight/complexity. It's really a game/strategy dependent decision.
You're going to have to consider your wire runs carefully (but that is true for pretty much any swerve).
It might not be possible, but it would save a considerable amount of chain (and space that cannot be used to mount because chain is there) if the steering motor is moved to the central support.

[Madison]

What makes it so that the wheel bogey in the middle turns across the carpet rather than the frame rotating around the wheels?

[Scott Morgan]

Originally Posted by M. Krass

What makes it so that the wheel bogey in the middle turns across the carpet rather than the frame rotating around the wheels?

I designed a concept system similar to this a few years ago. I addressed this problems with the inclusion of traction plates, operated by pneumatics. This plates would drop down and restrict the movement of the outer frame when you rotated the turntable.