pic: Pneumatic Gate Valve Actuator

[MrForbes]

loading photo ...

[Tytus Gerrish]

wow. thats awesome!!! i will make one right now

[Pavan Dave]

Originally Posted by Tytus Gerrish

wow. thats awesome!!! i will make one right now

The thought of that scares me.

[Chief Pride]

Originally Posted by Pavan

The thought of that scares me.

ROFL i dont know why but that thread made me laugh irl

[robostangs548]

Nice!

[Protronie]

Don't you think a ball value would work better?
How long is the over-all assembly? And what it weight?

[MrForbes]

Matt looked into using ball valves, and could not find any that would work with the pneumatic cylinders we had available. They have too much friction, for one thing.

Weight of the complete valve assembly is actually relatively low, although I don't have a number and it's all assembled now so I can't weigh it. You can visit a hardware store and look over the valves, and see how the weight compares between gate valves and ball valves, if you'd like.

[Akime123]

Thanks for sharing! I came accross this website to read more info on this great product: http://www.directindustry.com/indust...lve-61811.html

[IndySam]

Not spam sorry.

[Rosiebotboss]

So, let's start the discussion....would this combination of pneumatic and hydraulic components be FRC legal? If you think yes or no, please state the rule that would back up your descision.

[MrBasse]

Originally Posted by Rosiebotboss

So, let's start the discussion....would this combination of pneumatic and hydraulic components be FRC legal? If you think yes or no, please state the rule that would back up your decision.

It all depends on how you use the valve. For moving air, definitely not legal per R75 as it has no air pressure rating, per R76 as it has been heavily modified, and per R77 as it is not a part of the Kit of Parts nor is it functionally equivalent to a KOP item and doesn't appear anywhere on the accepted list.

If using it as a mechanical valve to transmit, say small game pieces. Totally legal

[MrBasse]

Originally Posted by MrForbes

Matt looked into using ball valves, and could not find any that would work with the pneumatic cylinders we had available. They have too much friction, for one thing.

Weight of the complete valve assembly is actually relatively low, although I don't have a number and it's all assembled now so I can't weigh it. You can visit a hardware store and look over the valves, and see how the weight compares between gate valves and ball valves, if you'd like.

We looked at ball valves as well and settled on the same solution you did. We found the gate valve to allow a larger initial flow of air over the ball valve. A shorter stroke makes more happen with the gate valve. Also they are cheap, easy to replace and take such a small amount of modification to make work with pneumatics it was a no brainer for us. Looks like clean work, should last you a long time too.

We actually changed out to a check valve from a well running in reverse on our new design. We use a cylinder to pull the barrel against the valve to unseat the valve and let air flow, then the air pressure left in the storage tank is used to reseal the valve when we let off the cylinder. It works pretty well but can let the o-ring blow out if you get too over zealous with the shirt flinging air pressure.