|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rule G36 conflicting Game Animation?
The Rule -
<G36> HOME STRETCH Height Restriction – ROBOTS in the HOME STRETCH of the opposing ALLIANCE can not be more than 6 feet tall. A PENALTY will be assigned for each infraction. conflicts with with the video because the robot is knocking ball off in the home stretch, that means that it is above six feet tall and is in illegal move. Which is right? Will Dean make a mistake? Rule G36 conflicting Game Animation? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule G36 conflicting Game Animation?
There are several threads about this topic already:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=60685 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=60700 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=60686 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=60690 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule G36 conflicting Game Animation?
My team just reviewed the animation - and the robot DE-SCOREING was a BLUE robot, and was in the BLUE alliance home zone. It reached OVER the lane divider to descore the red trackball
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule G36 conflicting Game Animation?
The incident in question is at 1:51 in the animation, with a red robot in the blue HOME STRETCH, though what you're referring to is potentially a violation of a different rule (<G22>, though that's much more debatable than this one).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2007 Game Rule Links (Inactive) | Mark McLeod | General Forum | 16 | 05-12-2006 22:28 |
| Animation of game. | Mark Jones | General Forum | 2 | 11-01-2004 11:05 |
| nats: stoping conflicting robot signals? | JasonStern | Technical Discussion | 25 | 25-05-2003 00:37 |
| question about the animation rule | brokenleftthumb | 3D Animation and Competition | 13 | 22-02-2003 22:30 |
| Conflicting Answers on FRCTech | Jon Abad | General Forum | 4 | 17-01-2002 22:32 |