3 regionals in one year.

[Racer26]

This amazing feat is mentioned time and time again. I'm getting conflicting messages about who's done it, so I wanted to clarify.

The ones I know about are:

47 in 1998
1114 in 2006, and 2008
1024 in 2008
1503 in 2006 (with 1114 all 3 times)

Also of note, there was a thread a while back about the same alliances winning regionals year after year.

I think 2007/08 Waterloo and GTR show the first example of the same two teams winning the same two regionals back to back years, with 1114 and 2056.

[Tstone]

Just back from Denver. Host mentioned that Denver was 1625 (Winnovation) 3rd Regional. They won. Looked at footage from Midwest and their alliance was the ONLY one to beat 1114 (even if only once). They were impressive consistantly racking up 16-20 in hybrid and 4+ hurdles per match.

Denver was our second.

[Guy Davidson]

The title might be a bit misleading. However, from the content, it seems that 1075guy is talking about teams winning three regionals in one year, not merely competing in three.

[Tstone]

Originally Posted by sumadin

The title might be a bit misleading. However, from the content, it seems that 1075guy is talking about teams winning three regionals in one year, not merely competing in three.

Got it! That makes sense.

[Karthik]

The feat of winning three regionals in one year is an impressive one, especially with all the luck involved in winning an FRC event. That being said, I have a feeling the club is so small, because so few teams attend 3 regionals. For example, there's no doubt in my mind that Team 71 would have won 3 regionals in 2001 and 2002 if they had attended three. Other examples would be Team 254 in any of their dominant two regional victory seasons (2004 comes to mind), or Team 330 last year.

[EricH]

Originally Posted by Karthik

Other examples would be Team 254 in any of their dominant two regional victory seasons (2004 comes to mind), or Team 330 last year.

Does a Championship division count as a regional? (I'm guessing not, but still...) And 330 has never attended more than 2 regionals. Time and funding...those two limiting factors we all have to deal with...

[Alex Cormier]

Originally Posted by Karthik

... I have a feeling the club is so small, because so few teams attend 3 regionals...

That makes me wonder. What if we include teams that went to more then one regional and won both? They possibly could not have gone to a third because of time and funding. Maybe add a* or something else?


And for those teams in that group, well done and it's amazing to see who is in there.

[JaneYoung]

I think there is room in FIRST for there to be very small to small groups that succeed in areas where others don't, continuing to raise the bar and show what can be done.

Succeeding in bringing home the gold in 3 regionals in one season is one such area. While the respected group is small, it serves as a group of teams that inspire and motivate the rest of us.

Other small groups are made up of teams who have won the regional Chairman's multiple times, again serving as role models for sustaining excellence and commitment to the goals of FIRST.

The WFAs are small but growing over time.
The HoFs are small but growing over time.

These are all small groups that inspire excellence, commitment, and reflect the different elements that combine to make FIRST.

I know this is about 3 regional wins in one season but as usual, I started thinking about other things.

[commodoredl]

1024 won three this year.

[Brandon Holley]

will someone ever win 4 ???

[Heretic121]

Originally Posted by Brandon Holley

will someone ever win 4 ???

why not just say 5 or six brandon while you are at it? =D

[FrozenFish]

Originally Posted by Alex Cormier

That makes me wonder. What if we include teams that went to more then one regional and won both? They possibly could not have gone to a third because of time and funding. Maybe add a* or something else?


And for those teams in that group, well done and it's amazing to see who is in there.

That's true. I know we could barely come up with the funds to make our second regional deadline. There was no hope of coming up with funding for a third.

Could we get an additional list with all those teams that have gone to two regionals and won both this year?

[115inventorsam]

Originally Posted by Alex Cormier

That makes me wonder. What if we include teams that went to more then one regional and won both? They possibly could not have gone to a third because of time and funding. Maybe add a* or something else?


And for those teams in that group, well done and it's amazing to see who is in there.

It's just not quite as special, and the list would be huge(Even my team would make it on that list). Though I suppose if someone had the time he/she could do it.

Winning 3 regionals is truely something. I don't think a team can win 3 regionals by luck, though my team did win both of our regionals this year as the second round pick.

[efoote868]

just my 2 cents, but wouldn't winning the championship event count for something?
I'd think that winning the championship would count as 2, 1 for the division and 1 for overall, any thoughts?

Also, would off-season events count as well? IRI has to be at least as tough as any other regional...

[Aren_Hill]

Originally Posted by efoote868

Also, would off-season events count as well? IRI has to be at least as tough as any other regional...

or its harder than champs itself...