|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 6w/d Chain base
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
looks sweet! The only thing I might suggest is a support bar i the middle. You dont want for somebody to hit you from the direct side and the whole chassis compresses inward. You could move both supports in a bit to fix it also without adding weight.
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
The only thing is the weight. 44 lbs is a lot, even with gearboxes. The lighter the better:
faster more weight for other things |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
how thick is the 4x1 tubing? 1/8"?
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
Also if you have access to a CNC or Waterjet, that would lose a lot of weight.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
Quote:
![]() You could also do the same cheese holes with the cross braces. Nice design though. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
Nice, but some teams own a cnc, so you may want to ask them. 1323 offers to help any team with machining if they need it.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
You could go with 3x1 tubing and angle aluminum for mounts to the transmissions. One angle aluminum piece on top of the 3x1 and one on the bottom, which should cover the 5" face of the transmission for mounting. The angle aluminum could be attached to the 3x1 via welding or via riveting.
Weight savings should be roughly 4.5 lbs assuming a 36"x27" base. Since that's 4.5 lbs of pure aluminum, it'd wind up being less expensive as well. Last edited by JesseK : 19-08-2008 at 10:29. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
Why not look into using plate and standoffs to save even more weight. You only lose a little bit of strength but it is easier to work on the drivetrain and much lighter. For an idea of what Im talking about take a look at this frame that we are working on :
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/31759 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6w/d Chain base
With your choice of using inner and outer frame rails to support your wheels, plus your use of standoffs (or what appear to be standoffs) between the frame members to protect the wheels in case of a side hit, you could use 4" x1" U-channel in place of the box tubing--that would save a lot of weight. Adding cross members (at least 1, probably 2), as suggested by RMS11, would be a good addition...and you could get away with using 1/16" wall on the cross members.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Base Idea | kajeevan | Extra Discussion | 10 | 27-07-2008 16:56 |
| Circle base vs. Rectangle base | Pelicano234 | Technical Discussion | 13 | 15-01-2008 16:49 |
| pic: "Driveable Base" | Cody Carey | Extra Discussion | 6 | 27-01-2007 23:29 |
| pic: 1024 Base | Michael Long | Robot Showcase | 4 | 17-02-2006 08:53 |
| Chain and chain breaker source? | kmcclary | Off-Season Events | 4 | 22-10-2001 22:51 |