|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
So, no ground pick up this year?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
its not in our strategy, but keep in mind this is just the frame. (waterjet cutters are awesome)
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
How much does that weigh as pictured?
It looks pretty light... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
How thick is the side rails of your frame?
With a lot of unanswered questions about the sides attached to bumpers and the cantilevered wheel questions, would that pass inspection? The fact that the side rails are also lightened based on your cutouts, would that meet the bumper attachment rules? My concern is that we have been discussing such options, but haven't figured whether it would pass or not. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
also the rails are made from 1/8" 5052 alloy
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
I would check with the GDC committee, as it may help answer questions for a lot of other teams.
The fact that your cutouts are "open spaces" which does not provide backing to the bumpers may be an issue. We would like to know the answer also. The reason why we haven't submitted a question similar (with a diagram), is because we dont have a frame yet. The GDC committee already stated that 1/8" rails are not strong enough, and thus, wont be allowed either. Last edited by waialua359 : 20-01-2009 at 18:03. Reason: saw your other additional post. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
I surely hope the GDC is not referring to 1/8" aluminum when used like this. This frame design is plenty strong enough and will not cause the robot to fail. That would be utterly absurd for the GDC to tell us that now we must build our frame out of 3/16" or 1/4" aluminum plate stock and that we also can't lighten the material.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
So who constructed your chassis, Motorola?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
What is this supposed to mean?
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
I believe he's asking where/what facility the beautiful machining work was done.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
our design team drew it up and one of our sponsors Harris and Bruno Intl. fabricated the drawings.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 295 chassis 1/19/09
when you say draw, do you mean a rough sketch?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 295 teaser | spc295 | Extra Discussion | 14 | 13-01-2009 13:18 |
| New AM C-Base Chassis vs. Old IFI KitBot Chassis? | ChuckDickerson | Kit & Additional Hardware | 5 | 06-01-2009 08:36 |
| pic: 6wd chassis | spc295 | Extra Discussion | 21 | 10-11-2008 09:00 |
| pic: milled chassis | spc295 | Extra Discussion | 5 | 07-11-2008 18:28 |
| pic: Top Chassis | Rick TYler | Robot Showcase | 1 | 04-02-2006 19:13 |