Go to Post Andy Baker's breakfast of choice is Kellog's Nuts and Bolts. - Adam Y. [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 19:54
jgannon's Avatar
jgannon jgannon is offline
I ᐸ3 Robots
AKA: Joey Gannon
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,467
jgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond repute
"Robot configuration" Q&A response

http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=13940

Can somebody help me to understand this Q&A response? The question is certainly a little unclear, but the way I read it, I'd be inclined to believe it's legal. Since the GDC opted to be curt in their reply, and didn't explain what rule the asker's design would violate, I don't know how they read the question, and consequently I don't know what they're ruling as illegal. Any guesses?
__________________
Team 1743 - The Short Circuits
2010 Pittsburgh Excellence in Design & Team Spirit Awards
2009 Pittsburgh Regional Champions (thanks to 222 and 1218)
2007 Pittsburgh Website Award
2006 Pittsburgh Regional Champions (thanks to 395 and 1038)
2006 Pittsburgh Rookie Inspiration & Highest Rookie Seed

Team 1388 - Eagle Robotics
2005 Sacramento Engineering Inspiration
2004 Curie Division Champions (thanks to 1038 and 175)
2004 Sacramento Rookie All-Star

_
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 19:58
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,789
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgannon View Post
http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=13940

Can somebody help me to understand this Q&A response? The question is certainly a little unclear, but the way I read it, I'd be inclined to believe it's legal. Since the GDC opted to be curt in their reply, and didn't explain what rule the asker's design would violate, I don't know how they read the question, and consequently I don't know what they're ruling as illegal. Any guesses?
You aren't the first one. I believe the key words are "expand and retract, within frame configuration, [to fit] through the tunnel". This indicates an articulated or expanding frame of some form, which is illegal under <R11>.

The question was also poorly worded, so I'm not surprised that it got such a short answer. I would also not be surprised to have clarification requested within a day or so on Q&A.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 21:17
J_Beth J_Beth is offline
Registered User
AKA: Justin Beth
FRC #0935 (RaileRobotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Newton Kansas
Posts: 47
J_Beth will become famous soon enoughJ_Beth will become famous soon enough
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

I think that the question was supposed to be asked, can the robot expand and contract within the set limits, without moving the bumpers out of the bumper zone.

I would think that this would be illegal because that would change your bumper perimeter.(violation of <R7>)
__________________
"I Wanna Be A Robot Maker!!!!"
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 22:52
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 6,998
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

It wouldn't necessarily change the bumper zone (assuming the bumpers never moved).

In any case, the question was poorly worded, so I think the GDC decided to just invite requests for clarification.
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 23:59
RRLedford RRLedford is offline
FTC 3507 Robo Theosis -- FRC 3135
AKA: Dick Ledford
FRC #3135 (Robotic Colonels)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 286
RRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

If we assume the direction of "expand" - "retract" - "expand" remained exclusively in a vertical direction, without the 60" height limit ever being exceeded, then I think this would be legal. The "NO" answer seems related to any horizontal expansion, where I am also confused.
Can a robot have an initially small size NON-articulated frame scheme with bumpers mounted and then have something swing out horizontally above & beyond the top of the bumper, but NOT extending beyond the 28" x 38" horizontal limits? I think the answer is: NO, because the bumpers could no longer offer protection for this member protruding beyond them above 16", and it would also pose a danger to other robots by jabbing into their upper structures above their bumpers.

The vertical expansion should be be allowed. What if I want to drive through tunnels earlier in the match and then grow the bot vertically to 60" at some point prior to the end of match, so that it is closer to the tower bar when the full expansion period finally starts. It can save me some time by already being at the 60" point, compared to reaching the bar from the smaller tunnel compatible size.

-RRLedford
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2010, 00:08
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,789
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

If vertical expansion is not allowed, then I would expect the next Update to announce this.

Also, RRLedford, you forgot the restrictions placed by rule <G30>, which limits anything from leaving the frame perimeter with some few exceptions. I would presume that the scenarios mentioned are precisely the reason for this rule.

There is so far no clarification.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2010, 20:40
Bill_B Bill_B is offline
You cannot not make a difference
FRC #2170
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,099
Bill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

Next year there will be a decal or sticker to be placed on the robot. it will form the origin point for a coordinate system of your choice. Robot dimensional limitations can then be expressed as distance from the origin point. But be careful, the limits may include rotational inertia in each of three dimensions about that point in addition to the usual weight limit.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2010, 22:17
LH Machinist LH Machinist is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 48
LH Machinist has a spectacular aura aboutLH Machinist has a spectacular aura aboutLH Machinist has a spectacular aura about
Re: "Robot configuration" Q&A response

IMHO the "NO" answer is without basis and contradicts team update 2 <G45>. Above the bumper zone..."Resetting or moving mechanisms while not in contact with a ball is permitted".

We understood the volume rules and team update 2 as we could collapse or expand vertically as long as we weren't contacting a ball.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[moderated]: In Response to "Taking FIRST and turning it into 'Israbluff'" ctartist236 General Forum 15 05-02-2014 23:15
Meaning of "Normal Configuration"? RedHeadRobotics General Forum 5 23-01-2010 18:17
G-FORCE's robot, named "philbot" a.k.a "armagedon in a polycarbonate box" Bryan_2818 Robot Showcase 0 12-04-2009 20:54
New Magazine "Robot" w/Vex, FIRST, & Lego everywhere Astronouth7303 FIRST In the News... 2 28-12-2005 18:06
Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? gnormhurst Programming 3 22-02-2004 02:55


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi