|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
I'll be interested to see how the prototyping pans out, but wood is great for whipping up some models to test on the bump.
We have an 8 wd mock up that we tested in both wide and long orientations before deciding to give up on the wide orientation. It looked good on the computer... but having something physical to manipulate made all the difference. Jason |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
Are you planning on actively articulating the wheel pods or just letting them conform to the ramp?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
My, that frame looks familar
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
we are doing something similar but with a slick wheel at the front,
We have been researching a system called Rocker-bogie ![]() Last edited by Valkyries_698 : 23-01-2010 at 03:08. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
I think you should ship the robot as is! I am sold on the wood chassis haha!
Looks like a ingenious idea. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
Mars rovers, right? Funny thing, I came up with something almost exactly the same (prototype design).
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
Tanks have been using a Rocker Bogie system since long before the rovers. Go take a look at the old Shermans, those are neat pieces of rolling coffins!
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
Quote:
well this rocker-bogie was worked on by someone that is on the game design team |
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
I believe the main advantage to articulating the wheel pods is to maintain a more level chassis while going over the bump.
Look at the wooden model in the picture Jason provided. If the rear wheel pods are articulated (rotated) so that only the rear-most wheels are touching, the angle of the main frame will be at a lesser incline and provide a greater safety factor to prevent the center of mass from getting close to the tipping point. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
Quote:
For those interested, the actual drive train weighs in at 45lbs. Yet that's also with a subframe capable of withstanding some pretty high stresses due to high tension. We feel the extra weight is a good trade-off for stability & reliability. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
Quote:
The chassis is based off of this concept that was thought of before the C-Base towers and Toughbox Nano's came out. That concept was based off of this concept of a natural terrain-hugging suspension. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010
It's a neat design. I wonder about the turning ability though...we are working feverishly to get our 8wd prototype running (hopefully today) so we can drive it around on carpet and on the bump. We are keeping the wheels fixed, but with spacing kind of like what you have--not evenly spaced, center wheels further apart longitudinally than the end wheels. With the end wheels raised just a bit.
We really like how 6wd robots drive, but were concerned about the bump, and we think the irregularly spaced, drop center wheel 8wd might be a good compromise between all the designs. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Drive Train Components: the inner working parts of a drive train | naruto137 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 10-12-2008 21:14 |
| pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train | Ken Delaney 357 | Technical Discussion | 64 | 29-03-2006 22:16 |
| pic: 1493 Drive Train 1 | Dan-o | Robot Showcase | 15 | 17-02-2005 14:59 |
| pic: 350 drive train | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 4 | 16-02-2004 00:05 |
| pic: 311's Drive Train | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 2 | 24-02-2003 18:09 |