|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robot Ripstick
Our team is thinking of using a chassis which is divided into two parts, front and back. The two would be connected in the middle with a pivot - allowing the two to swing side to side individually. If you've ever seen a Ripstick, that's essentially our idea. The problem is, we're not sure the bumpers would be within constraints; they wouldn't always be on the same plane.
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Ripstick
Check out CD media for our 03 bot something similar should work for ya
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Ripstick
For clarification: Let's define a coordinate frame with the z-axis pointing straight up from the floor and the x and y axes pointing horizontally. Does it pivot about the z-axis or the x/y axis?
If your answer is z-axis, you'll have to have a rigid frame perimeter to mount the bumpers on that is non-articulating (<R11>); have that and you should be legal. If your answer is x/y axis, same thing--rigid frame perimeter, non-articulating, all that good stuff. You'll need to take some extra care to make sure that the bumpers stay in the bumper zone (10-16" above the floor) unless you're going over the bump, but you should be OK. You'll also have to watch out for <G30>, but some careful planning should give you no problems there. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Ripstick
From Rev E of Section 8...
<R11> The FRAME PERIMETER must be comprised of fixed, non-articulated structural elements of the ROBOT. The FRAME PERIMETER must remain a fixed, unchanging polygon throughout the MATCH. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Robot Ripstick
For the sake of discussion, if this were legal what advantage do you gain for the added complexity? Is it worth it?
The only scenario I see this being useful in would be climbing up the bump at an angle. For this fringe case that can be potentially avoided by the drivers I don't see the added complexity as being worth it. Regarding the legality, as Al mentioned above the Frame Perimeter restrictions would apply. You would need a fixed, non-pivoting frame perimeter structure, a separate structure for the wheels that articulates the way you want and some type of spring or gas shock to connect them. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot Ripstick
not overly complex and helps keeping the wheels in contact with the ramp.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/15003 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot-to-robot and robot-to-trailer | GaryVoshol | Rules/Strategy | 11 | 06-01-2009 19:18 |
| pic: 233 robot teaser, yep, theres our robot ; ) | ducttapedude | Extra Discussion | 20 | 15-02-2007 22:02 |
| pic: Team 114 Real Robot Vs. Inventor Robot | James114 | Robot Showcase | 3 | 18-02-2005 13:02 |
| Can an a robot take a tetra from another robot in their allinace? | Koko Ed | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 10-01-2005 23:01 |
| Robot Gallery from the 2003 robot expostion in Tokyo, Japan | Andrew Rudolph | Chit-Chat | 1 | 04-12-2003 15:22 |