|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Update #8
I'm somewhat surprised at CD in general. I'd have thought this update's existence would have been announced here hours ago...
http://usfirst.org/uploadedFiles/Rob...Update%208.pdf The good news: FP motor pinion replacements are being handled through FRC, plus info on replacement cRIOs The bad news: no setting up any 802.11 a/b/g/n wireless communication at the events. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
Everyone's busy building robots Eric!
Glad the FP pinion confusion is being taken care of... -Brando |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
We are now allowed to use two way radios?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Update #8
That's the way it looks to me.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
The pinion confusion is just starting....we built a gearbox that uses the 15 tooth pinion gears that we recieved in the KOP.
Is it legal to use either pinion? or do we need to redesign and use the 19 tooth? ![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Update #8
Quote:
If the motors themselves are identical, there should be no issues. If different, FIRST could require replacement or allow both. Inspectors will normally accept a motor on its markings and not on the pinion gear. I would definitely post your concern to the official Q&A. Mike |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Update #8
I checked it yesterday at 5:40 and it was not up, I thought they had nothing to say and didn't put one out.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
Still prohibited by <T27>.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Update #8
Prohibited to have on the field, but for stands to pits communication we will probably be using one. Especially when we are in Pittsburg, international calling is expensive...
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Update #8
That's too bad, but understandable. It's going to be hard to enforce. Anyone in the crowd NOT associated with a team and/or unfamiliar with the rules can come into the venue with a Cradlepoint or a MiFi and set up a hotspot without knowing that doing so is prohibited. Imagine the already inconsistent pat-down procedures at the venue entrance, now with the added responsibility of checking for mobile hotspot devices.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
Quote:
Just a smidge harder than checking for IR coming from the crowd back in 2008... |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Update #8
There are a few interesting things in the twitter feed information at http://usfirst.org/uploadedFiles/Com...ter%20Feed.pdf.
1. They are prepared for scores to go to three digits. 2. They talk about bonuses that the referees give to teams, I expect these are points from the finale hanging. 3. Goal penalties are seperated from ref penalties (I would prefer them to spell out some of the words instead of doing this). 4. Ref penalties go into double digits and goal penalties go into triple digits. 5. I believe final score for the example should be 0 (-1) for red and 5 for blue. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Update #8
I expect them to fix that in another update.
Not hard to enforce. Devices are available to do this. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Update #8
At Atlanta last year we got to play with a device that was able to localize a "rogue" wifi node so that folks could go talk to them, and then optionally shut it down remotely. Very pretty toy.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Update #15 | ChuckDickerson | General Forum | 26 | 09-03-2006 23:21 |
| Update #14 | ChuckDickerson | General Forum | 1 | 02-03-2006 18:17 |
| Update 13 | Tomasz Bania | General Forum | 6 | 27-02-2006 23:12 |
| Update 12 | Tomasz Bania | General Forum | 1 | 25-02-2006 13:59 |