|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Cool tracks! What brand belts/pulleys are those? I'd love to see some closer shots of the drive base, as I always like to see different track implementations.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Quote:
There are two lowered center pulleys, giving a total ground contact of about 7" per side. Turning is wonderful. One end is the drive pulley; the other end has a sliding pulley for tension adjustment. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
I knew I recognized those Brecoflex belts. We used similar ones on our tracks in 2007/2008. Anybody that saw our drives knew they were cool (transversely mounted CIMs (2, room for 3 because we were allowed 6 one year) inside the loop of the belt itself) 2 bolts and 4 wires, plus the encoder, were all that was required to change a whole unit should one fail.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Quote:
The belts have a self-tracking guide - you can see the v-groove in the idler pulley. http://www.brecoflex.com/index.php?CATID=7&SCATID=64 I'd ask for weight and cost, but then, I already know. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
1075 had similar problems with snapping belts when side-loading them, we also had big problems with battery life, especially in the later iterations of our drivetrains (for FIRST Overdrive). This, and the fact that our modules were relatively heavy was one of the big reasons we moved away from it, first to a modularized 2 speed shifting 6wdDropCenter, and then in 2009 to our 2+2 swerve, and to our latest Drive train for 2010. This one is unlike anything I've ever seen before.
1625 has their 6 wheel swerve, and 148/217 have their nonadrive, both of which I love. 1075's bringing a new toy to Waterloo, GTR, Championships, KK11 and BE9. I can't wait to see what people will have to say about it. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
In our testing, the side loading problem was not encountered. We geared our motors so that the stall torque was safely less than the belt's breaking force. Once the side load reaches about 150 pounds, the motors have difficulty moving the robot, but the belts still do not break.
In the competition, we'll try to enter only head-on pushing matches. Dave |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Quote:
I'd love to see some videos of your team's matches once the regionals start, as it looks like you guys built a beast of a bot. ![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Beveling the belts is an interesting idea. What tool did you use do it? Our shop is not very well-stocked, so we would probably have to use a "belt" sander.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
Quote:
EDIT: Turns out they were custom ordered that way after the first few delammed. Last edited by CraigHickman : 25-02-2010 at 19:26. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1751's 2010 robot hanging
We're ordering a set of spare belts from Brecoflex, potentially with the beveled backing. Do you by any chance have a close-up picture of the modified belts?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team 1751's robot, stripped | Punkk242 | Robot Showcase | 0 | 17-02-2007 19:39 |
| pic: Our robot hanging. | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 07-04-2004 07:59 |
| pic: Closeup of the robot hanging on robot | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 16 | 09-03-2004 18:27 |
| pic: Team 48 Robot Hanging | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 1 | 01-03-2004 20:22 |
| pic: Cutting Edge's Robot hanging! | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 4 | 28-02-2004 23:14 |