|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
[wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Hi all,
I began editing FIRSTWiki a few days ago (probably a week ago now) as I was referencing it so much to find information on my own stuff, I thought I might as well contribute while I'm working on referencing it. Though, there are so issues with some articles and I don't really know what to do. I've looked at some of the community portal pages, but all indications kinda lead to me that the wiki is "dead" - having not had much community interaction on it for a while. Even the pages I've edited have been a few years out of date. From what the recent pages show, I'm the only one who's done a lot of editing on general pages in the last 30 days. So, is there still a administration running the show or has it kinda fallen apart? I really don't want to see such a good resource just topple over... -Tanner Last edited by Tanner : 07-03-2010 at 19:08. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
No response? Or what?
Anyone know of anything? Kinda want to have something before I start doing down the list of sysops asking questions... -Tanner |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Yeah. It's pretty dead.
The problem is that we never got a large enough base for it to be self-sustaining. And I don't think any of the sysops are actually students anymore. Just talk to someone if you have specific suggestions. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Quote:
Someone? I'm not even sure who to talk to. I just think its sad to see something go down without having a plan for the future. Pretty much right now, it seems I could do anything and there wouldn't be anyone to object. -Tanner |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Quote:
Documenting every team and every robot is daunting. We already have a source for white papers. Nobody feels like reposting all the technical information. Ideally, it would be a one-stop-shop of FIRST information; the Hitchhikers Guide to FIRST, if you will. But we only ever had a relatively small number of people working on articles. And when they graduated and drifted away from FIRST (I personally only volunteer at competitions anymore), no one replaced them. Technically, it's in need of repairs. MediaWiki needs updates. More extensions are needed. And nobody is around to stop spammers. You could talk to me. I came up with a lot of the templates and organization used. Quote:
More true than I should ever publicly admit. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Quote:
Quote:
The scope right now may be too big. If you try to do 1,000 things at once, you'll probably only get 250 of them done with the 750 rest being undeveloped. It's all about focus. If a certain section needs to be updated, then it should be a goal to update that section only for the month or something. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
-Tanner |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
I started doing some editing before the season started but noticed no other activity and stopped, thinking it was dead.
I'm willing to be 'fresh blood' and drive it with some other people. EDIT: Might as well add that I have experience php/css/java script and the what nots of the world of web development. Last edited by Boydean : 11-03-2010 at 23:56. Reason: added experience |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Quote:
I really just think there needs to be a plan rather than "hey - add what you find is missing." In retrospect, it works great when its done, but not very well when you're trying to get it done with small groups. -Tanner |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
I graduated from HS, but I'm far from leaving FIRST.
I'd love to help out in my free time, specifically during the off-season. I know some PHP/HTML/CSS, and while I haven't messed with MediaWiki much, I'm well-versed in vB, IPB, WP, Joomla, and MyBB, so I think I can learn quickly enough to help be a SysOp. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Quote:
Quote:
-Tanner |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
I'm sure there's plenty of people who'd like to add stuff about their teams. If anyone involved with the Wiki could develop some guidelines and hints for how people could help contribute, I think that would go a long way towards keeping it alive/updated. For instance, I could contribute to my team's page, and I'm sure that there's plenty of other willing volunteers that would say the same thing. Just some guidance and direction for what to do would harness the power of the community.
However, talking about FTP and PHP and technical jargon is a good way to scare off contributors. Making the wiki able to be contributed easily and making sure people know as much would be a good step to better community contributions. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [wiki]: FIRSTWiki Active?
Jack, anyone can contribute, even now. There's nothing stopping them.
But if we're talking about keeping the software updated and adding extensions (which I think was mentioned in this thread), then FTP and PHP are bound to appear. This is not to say that this thread is only about that, but I figured since I know about that stuff, that I would offer my assistance in that area. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [wiki]: Spammers on FIRSTwiki | Joe Ross | FIRSTwiki | 13 | 08-08-2009 11:34 |
| [wiki]: FIRSTwiki | SL8 | FIRSTwiki | 1 | 06-04-2008 14:46 |
| [wiki]: FIRSTwiki.net | Kristina Len | FIRSTwiki | 0 | 15-02-2008 10:02 |
| [wiki]: FIRSTwiki.net | Kristina Len | FIRSTwiki | 0 | 15-02-2008 09:59 |
| [wiki]: FIRSTwiki down? | Mr. Lim | FIRSTwiki | 1 | 14-02-2005 12:52 |