|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seeding Points vs State Rankings
Question; Is Michigan using the regular FIRST seeding points to rank teams during the districts for the finals and then using another system to Rank teams for the Championship? This spells trouble. It means you have to choose whats more important win loss record or seeding points. Seems like a troublesome algorithm for teams to endure.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Seeding Points vs State Rankings
Update 3 from FiM
Quote:
-Clinton- |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Seeding Points vs State Rankings
Quote:
Seeding points is only important for the top 8-12 teams to become alliance captains. If you are not an alliance captain, high seeding scores will not mean anything at all. We did not pick based on ranking that use seeding points. Some teams used to do that in past years but I don't think too many teams will do that this year with this weird system. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Seeding Points vs State Rankings
Quote:
-Clinton |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Seeding Points vs State Rankings
I brought this up to our team and quickly decieded, score ur butts off, win matches and be ranked first. (67 did this very well at Kettering)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Not Showing Up To A Match - Seeding Points? | Mr. Lim | Rules/Strategy | 16 | 07-03-2010 08:54 |
| 9.3.4 Match Seeding Points | theycallhimtom | Rules/Strategy | 92 | 25-01-2010 16:18 |
| Changing Rule 9.3.4 Match Seeding Points | Valley Raider | General Forum | 1 | 16-01-2010 15:49 |
| Match Seeding Points | Valley Raider | General Forum | 2 | 16-01-2010 14:22 |
| Match Seeding Points | Katie_UPS | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 09-01-2010 15:59 |