|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
Wow, what a change from the original! So, what was the reasoning behind all the changes?
Did you need a higher torque to weight ratio? Did you achieve it? Or maybe I should just ask for some specs. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
Is that a double doozy hooked to TWO AM shifting transmissions in series? giving 4 possible speeds?
EDIT: Oh, I see now, the "shuffle" is an AM Toughbox rehoused. I just had a thought though that would be interesting: What if you connect 3 AM Shifting Transmissions together (with different ratios in each) such that you would have 8 speeds, and then coded the software to shift it automatically, based on encoder velocity. Useful for FRC? Probably not... but cool? Absolutely. Last edited by Racer26 : 11-03-2010 at 13:31. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
Sounds like pretty much what I was describing, with 2 shifting stages instead of 3 or 4... Cool.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
Good Afternoon,
Yes the Shuffle has grown quite considerably. We swapped out the CIM for the Double Doozy from AM, and stacked the little devil! It runs at a turtle pace, about 7 RPM, but produces 251 foot pounds of torque! That's more than some small cars. Although it is quite a little beast, at this point I don't know if we are going to use it on the bot. We shipped with an arm, but before the FedEx man could get it on his truck the students were already changing it. That is why the original Shuffle was re-built into the Double-Trouble Shuffle. But they are looking at even more options now. Mark |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
Quote:
With 250FtLbs of torque, assuming you have accounted for all the losses in the different stages of transmission, and 7 RPM, you should be able to lift your robot on a 1.5 ft. arm over 3 ft. in less than 4.5 seconds. I'd say that is quite a successful design. Dr. Joe, Are my numbers right? |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Double-Trouble Shuffle
I do not believe the student that ran the numbers accounted for the loss in the different stages, but I will ask. The real issues is the spread between the gears under the weight with the lever arms. I am somewhat concerned that there will be so much between the teeth, that somehow, they will disengage. The side plates are Lexan, 3/8th inch to be exact. We were talking about using aluminum side plates, but to achieve the weight and the bearings fit at the correct depth we would weigh more than I think allowed. We are cutting it close, very close. We will see what these students come up with.
Mark |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: AndyMark has the Nano; we have the Shuffle! | rob_c | Extra Discussion | 10 | 19-01-2010 22:30 |
| IT'S BACK!!! Honor GP with an i-Pod Shuffle!! | OZ_341 | General Forum | 12 | 28-04-2005 21:11 |
| Just got my iPod Shuffle.... | Mr. Lim | Chit-Chat | 2 | 02-02-2005 16:12 |
| Double Trouble.. Ladder Logic.. what about this year? | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 22:18 |
| Beatty Shuffle | MChen | Regional Competitions | 1 | 03-04-2002 10:37 |