|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
I have been watching the Michigan State Championships with some interest.
First of all, the seeding points these guys are racking up are giant. I have not done the numbers, but after attending 2 regionals (Chesapeake and Long Island) and watching online the other weeks, I am ready to say that Michigan is the cream of the cream of the crop*. And I am not just talking 469 here. There are monster scores being put up over and over and over. Here is my question for you. As has been discussed elsewhere on these fori and in many many FIRST circles around the country since the Cass Tech District competition, 469 is the real deal. They have come as close to a lock on the Championship as any team has ever come. So... ...suppose you are at a pre-Championship competition with them. Suppose you have been battling with them for #1 seed. Suppose you edge them out. Do you pick them and be virtually assured of another trophy (all be it, not FIRST's Grand Championship in Atlanta) OR do you pick another offensive powerhouse and a team to be named later in an attempt to find out PRIOR to the Championships if ANYONE can beat them? Tough choice, high stakes. Would you give up a near certain Michigan State Championship (the win of a lifetime for many teams) in order to probe the limits of a team that you may face in Atlanta? Think about it. Let's hear what you have to say... Joe J. *I have predicted privately and now I predict online for the first time, that I believe that 4 of the 6 teams playing the last match on Einstein will be Michigan teams. The bottom half of the Michigan teams are the same as the bottom half around the country but the higher you go in the percentiles, the more distance the Michigan teams put between them and the rest of the country. I am far from unbiased on this matter but I think it is true. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
As far as I am concerned it has already been proven as possible at the Troy district event when 33/910/288 tied 217/469/1188 and the tie was due to a penalty on 33/910/288. I wish I could remember the specifics of the penalty. Unfortunately some mechanical failures on the 33/910/288 side prevented them from finishing the deal up.
Yes, I know that situation is not the same as beating them, but it is appreciably close that I would wait until I was forced to beat them and not go handicapping myself. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Joe,
I can understand exactly where you're coming from in your post, and after reading it, and thinking, I'd have to say that if the decision were up to me, I would skip picking a 469 type robot, and pick another offensive powerhouse. (Assuming we were of the caliber to seed #1 at an event like MSC) It's not that I have anything against the game that 469 plays, or anything against them as a team, I just would like to try and roll the dice and see if we could beat them with a conventional strategy. After seeing videos of the Defense that 1310 played on 1114 & 2056, I am sure that 469 can, and will be beaten with a similar style of defense, it's just a matter of when. Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Assuming the HoT #67 manages to keep the number 1 seed (I have not heard since 7 this morning). I believe they will pick 469 and get a decline. They will then pick either 217, 27, 33, or 910. 469 will then pick 217 if available and if not pick one of the other 4. Then after all is said and done they will pick a powerhouse defense. Juggernauts anyone? Or the team at Troy whose number I can't remember that simply had to nudge a robot to flip them right over (not supporting flipping just saying, that 6 wheel drive bot had some major push).
The point is, if they can break the cycle quickly, they can beat 469. The only hard part is in fact breaking that cycle or keeping it from happening. The best way to beat them is to block the tunnel in autonomous and wait until the balls from auton come back down the ball return, then leave and go play a real 3v3 game. If 469 doesn't have the initial cycle it becomes very slightly more difficult for them to walk all over the competition. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
67 is an absolute beast however something tells me that 469 would rather stick to having 217 on their side.
|
|
#7
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Do you think 217 would be around for 469 to pick as the 4th seed?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Hmm now that they results are posted.
1918 picks 469 - accept 67 picks 33 - accept 573 picks 27 or 217 - accept 70 picks the leftover or 910 - accept 1718 picks leftover - accept just my thoughts. All powerhouse scorers will be gone fast. Last edited by ALTrammell818 : 03-04-2010 at 12:43. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Well the Alliance are as follows:
1918 2834 469 573 1023 51 2612 67 217 33 1718 308 2619 226 2337 2137 70 910 2771 397 1711 201 27 703 Personally, I think that 67, 217 and 2612 will take this one. No disrespect to the first seed, but I saw 217 steal balls from 469, and this time, they can just get it one zone over, where 67 will be eagerly waiting to score. Nice props to 201 and 27 getting together and 33 1718 are also a force to be reckoned with. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
A big part for the higher ranking scores is they way they are playing.
I dont see much defense played at all. Either 1 or 2 teams in the home zone and either 1 or 2 teams in the middle. I saw a lot of alliances leaving the far zone empty with the mentality that we will outscore you, IMO. A true coopertition strategy in the race to the top of the rankings. For many that ARE playing defense, they are doing things that a real goalie would never do. Thus, ineffective.The bold prediction of Einstein will depend a lot on where teams are placed in the divisions at CMP. It'll be very highly anticipated in addition to Looking Forward's post. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
Correlation is not causeality. Please investigate years prior to the district system and look at how many Michigan teams performed above average in the championships before suggesting that the /newly/ formed district structure is a cause of Michigan being so competitive.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sacrificing a State Championship for the Cause???
With only one year to judge upon, I think it's impossible to be able to ascertain if the district system is making a difference, nor to expect it to make a large difference in its first year. It'll take a little time before most teams in Michigan are unaffected by how things are done out-of-state.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 1 | EricH | Fantasy FIRST | 29 | 03-04-2010 17:58 |
| [FF]: MI State Championship Tier 1 | EricH | Fantasy FIRST | 56 | 04-04-2009 18:04 |
| pic: Coaching at The Garden State Rumble FVC Championship | Jay Trzaskos | Extra Discussion | 5 | 11-12-2006 17:39 |
| get $10,000 for you cause.... | jlee25 | Chit-Chat | 0 | 22-07-2004 14:59 |
| A Small Favor for a Big Cause | ComBBAT_Amy | General Forum | 6 | 30-03-2003 12:26 |